Antigenic and cross-protection studies on two turbot scuticociliate isolates

The protection induced in turbot by inactivated vaccines containing either of two isolates (I(1) and C(1)) of the scuticociliate parasite Philasterides dicentrarchi, which causes important mortalities in turbot cultures, was evaluated in the present study. The results obtained after challenging the fish with the two isolates show that vaccination protected fish only against the homologous isolate, but did not confer cross-protection. The two isolates constitute two serotypes, as shown in the immobilization tests with mouse and turbot anti-I(1) and anti-C(1) antisera, in which only the homologous antisera immobilized the ciliates. ELISA assays, using total antigen free of proteases (TAWP), cytosolic antigens (CYA), ciliar antigens (CA) or membrane protein fraction (MPF), were also carried out. Differences in the levels of antibodies produced in mouse against the homologous and heterologous antigens were observed; these differences were significantly different when the antigen preparations used in the ELISA were TAWP, CYA or CA. Nevertheless, ELISA assays using turbot sera against TAWP did not show significant differences in the levels of antibodies against the homologous and heterologous antigens. Antigenic cross-reactivity was also detected in the Western blot assays, as well as significant differences in the patterns of antigenic recognition in the two isolates - in both reduced and non-reduced TAWP antigens, but which was noteworthy when mouse antisera were used. The results obtained in the present study demonstrate for the first time the existence of serotypes of the ciliate parasite of turbot Philasterides dicentrarchi that display clear antigenic differences, which must be taken into consideration in the future development of a vaccine against scuticociliatosis.