Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
Published on: February 3, 2015
False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields
Justin R Chumbley1, Karl J Friston
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK. j.chumbley@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
Controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) for individual voxels is insufficient for accurately inferring activation regions in statistical parametric mapping (SPM). A new method focusing on the FDR of connected excursion sets is proposed for reliable topological inference in neuroimaging.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Statistical Inference
- Data Analysis
Background:
- The false discovery rate (FDR) is a common metric for controlling errors in multiple comparisons.
- Conventional voxel-wise FDR procedures are widely used in statistical parametric mapping (SPM).
- However, these methods may not be suitable for inferring topological features like activation regions in continuous imaging data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the appropriateness of conventional voxel-wise FDR control for topological inference in SPM.
- To highlight the discrepancy between controlling voxel-wise FDR and controlling the FDR of activations.
- To propose a more suitable FDR control method for image-based statistical inference.
Main Methods:
- Revisiting existing literature on FDR control.
- Analyzing the characteristics of continuous signals in neuroimaging data.
- Developing and illustrating a novel FDR control strategy based on connected excursion sets.
Main Results:
- Controlling the FDR of individual voxels does not equate to controlling the FDR of actual activation clusters or regions.
- Inference based on conventional voxel-wise FDR is inadequate for identifying topological features in SPMs.
- A proposed solution involves controlling the FDR of connected excursion sets, characterized by their volume.
Conclusions:
- Standard voxel-wise FDR control is inappropriate for topological inference in statistical parametric mapping.
- A modified FDR approach, focusing on connected excursion sets, is necessary for accurate identification of activation patterns in neuroimaging.
- This revised approach ensures more reliable statistical inference on the spatial characteristics of brain activity.
Related Concept Videos
F Distribution
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first column of the Routh...
Random Error
