Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contextual F0 cues can outweigh talker F0 cues in fricative perception.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Working memory capacity predicts sensitivity to prosodic structure.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

More than words: Effects of grammaticality and lexical surprisal in self-paced reading.

Cognition·2026
Same author

IDLaS-DE - A Web-Based Platform for Running Customized Studies on Individual Differences in German Language Skills.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

Timing precision of the Individual Differences in Dutch Language Skills (IDLaS-NL) test battery.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Beat gestures facilitate lexical access in constraining sentence contexts.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Parallel processing of objects in a naming task.

Antje S Meyer1, Marc Ouellet, Christine Häcker

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. a.s.meyer@bham.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|July 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Speakers process object names in parallel, not sequentially. This parallel processing of visual objects during speech production was confirmed by analyzing gaze durations when identifying objects.

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Understanding object processing during speech production is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored sequential versus parallel processing models in language and vision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether speakers process object names sequentially or in parallel.
  • To determine the timing of object information retrieval during speech production.

Main Methods:

  • Participants named object triplets, with varying difficulty for the initial object.
  • An interloper object was replaced by a target object during saccade between first two objects.
  • Interloper and target objects varied in identity and name relation (identical, homophonous, unrelated).
  • Gaze durations to the target object were measured.

Main Results:

  • Gaze durations to the target were shorter when interloper and target were identical or homophonous compared to unrelated.
  • Facilitatory effects were stronger when the initial object was easy to process.
  • This interaction indicates parallel processing of the left and right objects.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support a parallel processing model for object naming.
  • Cognitive processes for object identification and naming can occur simultaneously.
  • Speech production involves parallel rather than strictly sequential information retrieval.