Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Crash causation, countermeasures, and policy - Editorial.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2024
Same author

Even correctly specified and well-estimated regression models can mislead.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2023
Same author

From Research to Practice - An Introduction to the Special Issue.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2020
Same author

Crash causation and prevention.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2020
Same author

Engineering judgment and road safety.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2019
Same author

An exemplum and its road safety morals.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2016
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
06:38

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: June 9, 2020

How many accidents are needed to show a difference?

Ezra Hauer1

  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 Merton Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Ezra.Hauer@utoronto.ca

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|July 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Determine the necessary number of road accidents for reliable study conclusions and quantify the confidence in findings. This method provides practical precision for road safety analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Road safety
  • Statistical analysis
  • Traffic engineering

Background:

  • Road safety studies require sufficient accident data for statistically valid conclusions.
  • Quantifying the confidence level of study findings is crucial for practical application.
  • Existing methods for sample size and confidence estimation can be complex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a simplified, practical method for estimating required accident data.
  • To provide a straightforward approach for determining confidence levels in road safety conclusions.
  • To offer a 'back-of-the-envelope' calculation for road safety analysis.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines a simplified approach to sample size calculation.
  • It describes a method for assessing the precision of conclusions based on available data.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
06:38

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: June 9, 2020

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

  • Focuses on practical estimation rather than complex statistical modeling.
  • Main Results:

    • The proposed method allows for quick estimation of necessary accident data.
    • It enables researchers to state conclusions with appropriate confidence levels.
    • Offers a pragmatic tool for road safety practitioners.

    Conclusions:

    • A simplified method exists for determining sample size and confidence in road safety studies.
    • This approach provides sufficient precision for practical decision-making.
    • Facilitates more accessible statistical planning in road safety research.