Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026
Knotless Independent Double-Row Repair and Biceps Augmentation for Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 23, 2026
Suture anchor fixation strength in osteopenic versus non-osteopenic bone for rotator cuff repair
Matthias F Pietschmann1, Valerie Fröhlich, Andreas Ficklscherer
1Department of Orthopedics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Germany. mpietschmann@yahoo.com
Introduction:
Rotator cuff tears are increasing with age. Does osteopenic bone have an influence on the pullout strength of suture anchors?
Materials And Methods:
SPIRALOK 5.0 mm (DePuy Mitek), Super Revo 5 mm and UltraSorb (both ConMed Linvatec) suture anchors were tested in six osteopenic and six healthy human cadaveric humeri. Incremental cyclic loading was performed. The ultimate failure load, anchor displacement, and the mode of failure were recorded.
Results:
In the non-osteopenic bone group, the absorbable SPIRALOK 5.0 mm achieved a significantly better pullout strength (274 N +/- 29 N, mean +/- SD) than the titanium anchor Super Revo 5 mm (188 N +/- 34 N, mean +/- SD), and the tilting anchor UltraSorb (192 N +/- 34 N, mean +/- SD). In the osteopenic bone group no significant difference in the pullout strength was found. The failure mechanisms, such as anchor pullout, rupture at eyelet, suture breakage and breakage of eyelet, varied between the anchors.
Conclusion:
The present study demonstrates that, in osteopenic bone, absorbable suture anchors do not have lower pullout strengths than metal anchors. In normal bone, the bioabsorbable anchor in this study even outperformed the non-absorbable anchor.