Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Are mastectomy rates a reasonable quality measure of breast cancer surgery?
Laurence E McCahill1, Alicia R Privette, Michael R Hart
1Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. laurence.mccahill@uvm.edu
Background:
Quality measures of breast cancer clinical management adopted by the National Quality Forum do not address the quality of surgical performance. We evaluated mastectomy rate as one potential quality indicator.
Methods:
We reviewed the surgical management of small (stage T1; < or =2 cm) invasive breast tumors in patients treated from April 2003 through April 2007 at our institution. For patients undergoing mastectomy, factors leading to the selection of mastectomy were analyzed.
Results:
We identified 496 patients with invasive breast cancer: 433 did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 319 of these had pathologic tumors < or =2 cm in size. Of these, 55 (17.2%) underwent initial mastectomy. Medical contraindications to breast conservation were identified in 42 of 319 (13.2%) patients, whereas the selection of mastectomy was attributed to patient choice in 13 of 319 (4.1%) patients.
Conclusions:
Medical contraindications to breast-conserving therapy were much more common than patient choice as the indication for mastectomy. Institution- or surgeon-specific mastectomy rates are unlikely to reflect the complexity of decision making in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer.
