Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Application of Nonlinear Inequalities01:29

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities

A nonlinear inequality describes a comparison involving an expression that curves or behaves more complexly than a straight line. These inequalities often appear in forms that include squares, products, or variables in the denominator.To solve such an inequality, one starts by rewriting it so that zero appears on one side. For example, the inequality:  can be factored as: This form makes it easier to identify the values that cause the expression to equal zero. In this case, the key values are 3...
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pea plants conditionally sanction less effectively fixing rhizobia at the level of whole nodules rather than single cells.

Journal of experimental botany·2026
Same author

Recent community warming of moths in Finland is driven by extinction in the north and colonisation in the south.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Integration of population genetics with oceanographic models reveals strong connectivity among coral reefs across Seychelles.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Marked differences in foraging area use and susceptibility to predation between two closely-related tropical seabirds.

Oecologia·2023
Same author

Sources of marine debris for Seychelles and other remote islands in the western Indian Ocean.

Marine pollution bulletin·2023
Same author

Limited domestic introgression in a final refuge of the wild pigeon.

iScience·2022
Same journal

Lucky To Be Alive, Luckier to Breed: Lifetime Reproduction in Weddell Seals.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Three-Dimensional Correlated Random Walks for Animal Movement and Habitat Selection.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Higher-Order Interactions Can Promote Coexistence by Rewiring Intransitivities Into Competitive Networks.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Plants That Evolved Under High Phylogenetic Diversity Have Higher Invasion Success, Particularly in Undisturbed Communities.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Food Web Resistance to Environmental Change.

Ecology letters·2026
Same journal

AI, Comparative Advantage, and the Next Decade of Ecological Research.

Ecology letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Why equalising trade-offs aren't always neutral.

Lindsay A Turnbull1, Mark Rees, Drew W Purves

  • 1Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland. lindsayt@uwinst.uzh.ch

Ecology Letters
|July 12, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neutral theory in ecology suggests trade-offs balance seed size and number. However, this study reveals that random seed arrivals can deterministically exclude larger-seeded species, challenging neutral community dynamics.

More Related Videos

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Community Ecology
  • Theoretical Ecology

Background:

  • Neutral theory posits that species differences are neutral, with trade-offs like seed mass vs. number reconciling theory with observations.
  • Size-symmetric competition, where resource capture scales with mass, implies competition outcomes are independent of seed size-number strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the implications of "equalizing trade-offs" for neutral community dynamics.
  • To determine if stochasticity in seed arrivals under size-symmetric competition leads to deterministic exclusion or neutral drift.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of plant community dynamics.
  • Analysis of competition outcomes under varying seed size-number strategies and stochastic seed rain.

Main Results:

  • Under size-symmetric competition, stochastic seed rain deterministically excludes all but the smallest-seeded species, contrary to neutral drift expectations.
  • A neutral outcome is only possible in a specific scenario where seed mass influences survival but not competition.

Conclusions:

  • The "equalizing trade-off" hypothesis, as commonly applied, does not fully support neutral community dynamics due to the impact of stochasticity.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the roles of neutrality versus niche structure in shaping ecological communities.