Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Some Geometric Methods for Constructing Decision Criteria Based On Two-Dimensional Parameters.

Peter F Thall1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, USA,

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
|July 12, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BAR12: Bayesian Autoregressive Phase 1-2 Design for Cell Therapy Trials With Manufacturing Changes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

High-Dose Chemotherapy for Multiply or Poor-Risk Relapsed Germ Cell Tumors.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2025
Same author

Precision generalized phase I-II designs.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Practical Bayesian Guidelines for Small Randomized Oncology Trials.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Enhancement of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous SCT with the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib for Refractory Lymphoma.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2025
Same author

Bayesian Safety and Futility Monitoring in Phase II Trials Using One Utility-Based Rule.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same journal

Comparing Adaptive Interventions under a General Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design via Multiple Comparisons with the Best.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2026
Same journal

Variable Selection in Ultra-high Dimensional Feature Space for the Cox Model with Interval-Censored Data.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2026
Same journal

On semi-supervised estimation using exponential tilt mixture models.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2025
Same journal

Regression-Assisted Bayesian Record Linkage for Causal Inference in Observational Studies with Covariates Spread Over Two Files.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2024
Same journal

Efficient inference of parent-of-origin effect using case-control mother-child genotype data.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2024
Same journal

Distributed eQTL analysis with auxiliary information.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2024
See all related articles

This paper reviews geometric methods for creating statistical decision rules using 2-dimensional treatment effect parameters. These methods aid in medical decisions by analyzing efficacy and toxicity probabilities.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Statistical decision rules are crucial in medical settings for treatment comparison and dose selection.
  • Characterizing treatment effects often involves 2-dimensional parameters, such as efficacy and toxicity probabilities.
  • Existing methods may not fully leverage geometric approaches for defining these decision rules.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and present two novel geometric methods for defining statistical decision rules.
  • To provide a general framework applicable to various medical decision-making scenarios.
  • To illustrate the application of these methods in real-world medical contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Geometric constructs in a 2-dimensional parameter space are utilized.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Method 1: Uses equally desirable contours to partition the parameter space.
  • Method 2: Employs a convex set of desirable parameter pairs within a Bayesian framework.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed geometric methods offer a structured approach to defining decision rules.
    • Contour-based partitioning effectively discriminates between parameter pairs based on desirability.
    • Bayesian formulation with convex sets provides a robust decision-making framework.

    Conclusions:

    • Geometric methods offer a powerful and intuitive way to define statistical decision rules in medicine.
    • These approaches enhance the analysis of treatment effects by incorporating efficacy and toxicity.
    • The reviewed methods provide valuable tools for optimizing medical treatment strategies.