Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
Published on: April 8, 2022
Spirometry in an unselected group of 6-year-old children: the DARC birth cohort study
Henrik Fomsgaard Kjaer1, Esben Eller, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
1Department of Dermatology, Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. henrik.fomsgaard.kjaer@ouh.regionsyddanmark.dk
Insights
This study established reference equations for spirometry in 6-year-old children, finding it feasible for diagnosing asthma. Bronchodilator testing showed potential for distinguishing asthmatic children from healthy ones.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Respiratory Medicine
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Spirometry is crucial for diagnosing pediatric respiratory conditions.
- Establishing reliable reference values for spirometry in young children is essential for accurate interpretation.
- The utility of spirometry, including bronchodilator response, in diagnosing asthma in 6-year-olds requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop reference equations for spirometric parameters in 6-year-old children.
- To assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of spirometry in distinguishing healthy children from those with asthma.
- To evaluate the role of bronchodilator testing in asthma diagnosis in this age group.
Main Methods:
- Recruited 404 children (6 years old) from a longitudinal birth cohort study.
- Collected baseline spirometry data and assessed respiratory symptoms.
- Administered bronchodilator measurements to children with and without asthma.
Main Results:
- Spirometry was feasible in 91% of children, with acceptable reproducibility.
- Height was the primary predictor for most spirometric indices (except FEV1/FVC); gender differences were noted.
- Bronchodilator responsiveness (Delta FEV1) differed significantly between healthy children and those with asthma (3.1% vs. 6.1%), with a cutoff of 7.8% yielding 46% sensitivity and 92% specificity for asthma.
Conclusions:
- Spirometry is a feasible diagnostic tool for 6-year-old children, with established reference values.
- While baseline spirometry shows overlap, bronchodilator testing enhances the ability to discriminate asthma in this age group.
- Accurate diagnosis of asthma in young children using spirometry necessitates understanding the sensitivity and specificity of these tests.
Abstract:
This study presents reference equations for spirometric parameters in 6-year-old children and evaluates the ability of spirometry to discriminate healthy children from children with asthma. Baseline spirometry and respiratory symptoms were assessed in 404 children participating in a longitudinal birth cohort study. Children with known asthma, possible asthma and a control group also performed bronchodilator measurements. At least two acceptable flow-volume curves at baseline were obtained by 368/404 children (91%). The two best values for FEV1 and FVC were within 5% of each other in 88% and 83% of children, respectively. Linear regression analyses for 242 children included in the reference population demonstrated height to be the main predictor of all spirometric indices except FEV1/FVC. FEV1, FEV75, and FVC correlated reasonably to anthropometric data in contrast to flow parameters. Gender differences were found for FEV1, FVC, and FEV75, but not for flow parameters. Asthma was diagnosed in 25/404 children. Baseline lung function in healthy children and children with asthma overlapped, although asthmatic children could be discriminated to some extent. Bronchodilator tests showed a difference in Delta FEV1(mean) between healthy children and children with asthma (3.1% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.05). At a cut-off point of Delta FEV1 = 7.8%, bronchodilator tests had a sensitivity of 46% and a specificity of 92% for current asthma. Spirometry including bronchodilator measurements was demonstrated to be feasible in 6-year-old children and reference values were determined. Spirometry aids the diagnosis of asthma in young children, but knowledge on sensitivity and specificity of these measurements is a prerequisite.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration can...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...

