Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
Published on: April 3, 2026
The status of sign language instruction in institutions of higher education: 1994-2004
Sheryl B Cooper1, Joel I Reisman, Douglas Watson
1Deaf Studies Program, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA.
Abstract:
Surveys of sign language programs in institutions of higher education in the United States, conducted in 1994 and 2004, are compared to reveal changes over time. Data are presented concerning the institutional environment of programs, program administrators, and instructors. Institutions examined in 2004 were on average 5 years older than those examined in 1994. More institutions accepted sign language for general education and foreign language requirements. Program administrators in 2004 were more likely to have primary duties as teachers rather than administrators, and to have greater understanding of the subject matter. Faculty in 2004 had more education and teaching experience. Full-time faculty showed increases in the proportion who were Deaf and the proportion who were in tenure-track positions. Program staff size increased. Overall, evidence indicates that sign language has become more accepted as an academic discipline and that programs are more entrenched at their institutions.
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records
Contact-dependent Signaling
Gap Junctions
In animal cells, gap junctions are formed...
Introduction to the Sign Test
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Significance Testing: Overview

