Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Online Size-exclusion and Ion-exchange Chromatography on a SAXS Beamline
Published on: January 5, 2017
Buffer exchange using size exclusion chromatography, countercurrent dialysis, and tangential flow filtration: Models,
R T Kurnik1, A W Yu, G S Blank
1Genentech Inc. 460 Point San Bruno Boulevard, San Francisco, California 94080.
Tangential flow filtration (TFF) and countercurrent dialysis (CCD) offer superior buffer exchange efficiency and economic advantages over size exclusion chromatography (SEC) for industrial protein processing. TFF and CCD significantly reduce operational time, buffer needs, and plant space requirements compared to SEC.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Chemical Engineering
- Protein Chemistry
Background:
- Industrial-scale protein purification relies on efficient buffer exchange methods.
- Key technologies include size exclusion chromatography (SEC), tangential flow filtration (TFF), and countercurrent dialysis (CCD).
- Optimizing these processes requires a comparative analysis of their technological and economic performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare SEC, TFF, and CCD for industrial protein buffer exchange.
- To develop new mathematical models for direct comparison of unit operations.
- To identify the optimal technology based on process variables and economic factors.
Main Methods:
- Development of new mathematical models for comparing SEC, TFF, and CCD.
- Introduction of the 'diavolume equivalent' concept for SEC.
- Evaluation of variables: buffer exchange range, dilution, yield, buffer needs, operating time, throughput, plant space, capital, raw materials, and labor costs.
Main Results:
- TFF and CCD demonstrate a broader range of buffer exchange compared to SEC.
- TFF allows for simultaneous protein concentration.
- TFF and CCD offer a 2- to 5-fold improvement in efficiency for key variables (time, buffer, space) compared to SEC for equal batch sizes and yields.
- TFF and CCD lead to reduced manufacturing plant size and better utilization of facilities.
Conclusions:
- TFF and CCD are generally more advantageous than SEC for industrial buffer exchange due to efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
- SEC or CCD may be preferred if protein denaturation is a concern with TFF.
- The choice of technology depends on specific process requirements, scale, and protein characteristics.
Related Concept Videos
Dialysis
Ion-Exchange Chromatography
Size-Exclusion Chromatography
Silica particles offer advantages such as rigidity,...
Ion Exchange
Capillary Electrophoresis: Applications
Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) separates ionic components based on their electrophoretic mobility. It has been used to separate proteins, amino acids,...
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration

