Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Intracranial Pharmacotherapy and Pain Assays in Rodents
Published on: April 9, 2019
What is the evidence for implantable drug delivery systems for refractory cancer pain?
Thomas J Smith1, Patrick Coyne
1Division of Hematology/Oncology and Palliative Care, Massey Cancer Center of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Abstract:
Despite best management, 14% of patients with cancer have unrelieved pain and many more have undesirable side effects from pain medicines. Intrathecal implantable drug delivery systems (IDDSs) manage intractable cancer pain by delivering pain medications directly to the spinal fluid. In addition to data from many nonrandomized trials, there are now randomized clinical trial data showing better clinical success, pain relief, drug toxicity control, and perhaps survival compared with comprehensive medical management (CMM). We reviewed published cohort reports from 1980 through 2003 using Medline. We studied 202 patients with unrelieved pain on visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores of >/= 5 on a scale of 0-10 despite conventional management. The main outcome measure was clinical success, defined as a 20% improvement in pain control and composite drug toxicity. We ranked the trials according to accepted levels of evidence. The nonrandomized trials all showed pain relief with acceptable complication rates, but often did not have standardized assessment schemas, had no control groups, and were single-institutional trials. In the randomized trial, more patients had clinical success with IDDS (84.5%) than with CMM (70.5%, P < 0.05). After 4 weeks, the mean VAS pain score decreased from the baseline of 7.75 to 4.74 (39% reduction) in the CMM group and from 7.45 to 3.59 (52% reduction) in the IDDS group (P = 0.057). The drug toxicity scores decreased from the baseline of 6.35 to 5.18 (19% reduction) in the CMM group and from 7.14 to 3.46 (52% reduction) in the IDDS group (P = 0.01). All individual toxicities were improved more by IDDS, especially fatigue and depressed level of consciousness. Patients randomized to IDDS therapy had improved survival, with 53.9% alive at 6 months compared with 37.2% of the CMM group (P = 0.06). There is now high-level randomized clinical trial evidence, in addition to consistent nonrandomized evidence, that IDDSs reduce pain and common drug toxicities and are associated with improved survival. Added to the multiple cohort studies, the evidence is compelling in favor of IDDS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Drug Delivery Systems: Injectables, Implants, and Infusion Devices
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems
Drug Delivery: Miscellaneous Routes
Oral inhalation and nasal sprays swiftly transfer drugs across the respiratory epithelium's mucosal layer. Inhaled glucocorticoids and bronchodilators directly target lung conditions such as asthma, while fluticasone nasal spray mitigates allergic rhinitis.
Transdermal patches transport drugs through the...
Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Continuous-Release Systems
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
Analgesia and Pain Management

