Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Abatacept in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal
Nicolino Ruperto1, Daniel J Lovell, Pierre Quartier
1IRCCS G Gaslini, PRINTO, Genoa, Italy. nicolaruperto@ospedale-gaslini.ge.it
Insights
Abatacept significantly reduced arthritis flares in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who did not respond to other treatments. This selective T-cell costimulation modulator offers a safe and effective alternative for managing refractory JIA.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) poses treatment challenges, with some children unresponsive or intolerant to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents.
- Abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, presents a potential therapeutic option for these difficult-to-treat cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept in pediatric patients diagnosed with JIA who had previously failed other treatments.
- To determine if abatacept can prevent or delay arthritis flares in this specific patient population.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind, randomized controlled withdrawal trial involving 190 children (aged 6-17 years) with active JIA and inadequate response to prior DMARDs.
- Patients received open-label abatacept for 4 months, followed by randomization to continue abatacept or receive placebo for 6 months, with time to flare as the primary endpoint.
Main Results:
- Significantly fewer arthritis flares occurred in the abatacept group (20%) compared to placebo (53%) during the double-blind phase (p=0.0003).
- The risk of flare was reduced by over two-thirds for patients continuing abatacept (hazard ratio 0.31).
- Adverse event frequencies were similar between groups, with no significant difference in serious adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Selective T-cell costimulation modulation with abatacept is a viable and effective alternative treatment for children with JIA.
- Abatacept demonstrates a favorable safety profile and efficacy in a pediatric population with refractory JIA.
Background:
Some children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis either do not respond, or are intolerant to, treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who had failed previous treatments.
Methods:
We did a double-blind, randomised controlled withdrawal trial between February, 2004, and June, 2006. We enrolled 190 patients aged 6-17 years, from 45 centres, who had a history of active juvenile idiopathic arthritis; at least five active joints; and an inadequate response to, or intolerance to, at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. All 190 patients were given 10 mg/kg of abatacept intravenously in the open-label period of 4 months. Of the 170 patients who completed this lead-in course, 47 did not respond to the treatment according to predefined American College of Rheumatology (ACR) paediatric criteria and were excluded. Of the patients who did respond to abatacept, 60 were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg/kg of abatacept at 28-day intervals for 6 months, or until a flare of the arthritis, and 62 were randomly assigned to receive placebo at the same dose and timing. The primary endpoint was time to flare of arthritis. Flare was defined as worsening of 30% or more in at least three of six core variables, with at least 30% improvement in no more than one variable. We analysed all patients who were treated as per protocol. This trial is registered, number NCT00095173.
Findings:
Flares of arthritis occurred in 33 of 62 (53%) patients who were given placebo and 12 of 60 (20%) abatacept patients during the double-blind treatment (p=0.0003). Median time to flare of arthritis was 6 months for patients given placebo (insufficient events to calculate IQR); insufficient events had occurred in the abatacept group for median time to flare to be assessed (p=0.0002). The risk of flare in patients who continued abatacept was less than a third of that for controls during that double-blind period (hazard ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.95). During the double-blind period, the frequency of adverse events did not differ in the two treatment groups. Adverse events were recorded in 37 abatacept recipients (62%) and 34 (55%) placebo recipients (p=0.47); only two serious adverse events were reported, both in controls (p=0.50).
Interpretation:
Selective modulation of T-cell costimulation with abatacept is a rational alternative treatment for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Funding:
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Blinding