Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Current clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting
Michael J Mack1, Syma L Prince, Morley Herbert
1Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA. slhill@csant.com
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) showed lower repeat revascularization rates than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, major adverse cardiac events, mortality, and myocardial infarction were similar between CABG and PCI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Previous randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may not reflect current practices with drug-eluting stents (DES) and off-pump CABG.
- A prospective registry was established to compare clinical outcomes of contemporary CABG and PCI strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes of coronary revascularization using on-pump CABG, off-pump CABG, and PCI with or without DES.
- To evaluate rates of major adverse cardiac events, repeat revascularization, and event-free survival at 18 months.
Main Methods:
- Prospective registry of 4336 patients undergoing isolated coronary revascularization across 8 community hospitals.
- Data collection included preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural variables.
- Outcomes were assessed at 18 months via patient/physician contact and the Social Security Death Index.
Main Results:
- Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 14.7% of CABG patients versus 23.3% of PCI patients (p < 0.001).
- Repeat revascularization was significantly lower with CABG (6.2%) compared to PCI (13.6%) (p < 0.001).
- Mortality and myocardial infarction rates were similar; event-free survival was higher for CABG (85.3%) than PCI (76.8%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- CABG is associated with significantly lower rates of repeat revascularization compared to PCI.
- No significant differences were observed in mortality or myocardial infarction rates between CABG and PCI.
- Outcomes were comparable between on-pump and off-pump CABG, and between DES and bare-metal stents (BMS) in PCI.
Background:
Randomized trials have compared coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, results of these trials in select patients may not accurately reflect current clinical practice using drug-eluting stents (DES) and off-pump CABG. We undertook a prospective registry of coronary revascularization by CABG on-pump and off-pump, and PCI with or without DES, to determine clinical outcomes.
Methods:
All patients undergoing isolated coronary revascularization in 8 community-based hospitals were enrolled. Preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural data were captured, with outcomes obtained at 18 months by patient and physician contact, and the Social Security Death Index.
Results:
The study enrolled 4336 patients, 71.2% PCI and 28.8% CABG. DESs were used in 2249 PCIs (73.1%), and 596 CABG procedures (47.8%) were off-pump. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 18 months was 14.7% for CABG vs 23.3% for PCI (p < 0.001). Cardiac death and myocardial infarction had similar rates. The need for repeat revascularization was significantly less with CABG (6.2% vs 13.6%, p < 0.001). Hazard ratio of CABG to PCI was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.571 to 0.872). CABG outcome was similar on-pump and off-pump, as was repeat revascularization with DES (12.1%) vs BMS (14.9%; p = 0.096). Overall event-free survival was 85.3% in CABG and 76.8% in PCI (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Rates of repeat revascularization were significantly higher for PCI than for CABG, but mortality and myocardial infarction were the same. There were no significant differences in outcomes between DES and BMS or between on-pump and off-pump CABG.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
