Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
Properties of contact matrices induced by pairwise interactions in proteins
Sanzo Miyazawa1, Akira R Kinjo
1Graduate School of Engineering, Gunma University, Kiryu, Gunma 376-8515, Japan. miyazawa@smlab.sci.gunma-u.ac.jp
Abstract:
The properties of contact matrices ( C matrices) needed for native proteins to be the lowest-energy conformations are considered in relation to a contact energy matrix ( E matrix). The total conformational energy is assumed to consist of pairwise interaction energies between atoms or residues, each of which is expressed as a product of a conformation-dependent function (an element of the C matrix) and a sequence-dependent energy parameter (an element of the E matrix). Such pairwise interactions in proteins force native C matrices to be in a relationship as if the interactions are a Go-like potential [N. Go, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 12, 183 (1983)] for the native C matrix, because the lowest bound of the total energy function is equal to the total energy of the native conformation interacting in a Go-like pairwise potential. This relationship between C and E matrices corresponds to (a) a parallel relationship between the eigenvectors of the C and E matrices and a linear relationship between their eigenvalues and (b) a parallel relationship between a contact number vector and the principal eigenvectors of the C and E matrices, where the E matrix is expanded in a series of eigenspaces with an additional constant term. The additional constant term in the spectral expansion of the E matrix is indicated by the lowest bound of the total energy function to correspond to a threshold of contact energy that approximately separates native contacts from non-native ones. Inner products between the principal eigenvector of the C matrix, that of the E matrix, and a contact number vector have been examined for 182 proteins, each of which is a representative from each family of the SCOP database [Murzin, J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536 (1995)], and the results indicate the parallel tendencies between those vectors. A statistical contact potential [S. Miyazawa and R. L. Jernigan, Proteins 34, 49 (1999); S. Miyazawa and R. L. Jernigan, Proteins50, 35 (2003)] estimated from protein crystal structures was used to evaluate pairwise residue-residue interactions in the proteins. In addition, the spectral representation of C and E matrices reveals that pairwise residue-residue interactions, which depend only on the types of interacting amino acids, but not on other residues in a protein, are insufficient and other interactions including residue connectivities and steric hindrance are needed to make native structures unique lowest-energy conformations.
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein-Protein Interfaces
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...

