Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Valence Bond Theory02:42

Valence Bond Theory

Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of one, the...
Fermi Level Dynamics01:12

Fermi Level Dynamics

The vacuum level denotes the energy threshold required for an electron to escape from a material surface. It is usually positioned above the conduction band of a semiconductor and acts as a benchmark for comparing electron energies within various materials.
Electron affinity in semiconductors refers to the energy gap between the minimum of its conduction band and the vacuum level and it is a critical parameter in determining how easily a semiconductor can accept additional electrons.
The work...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the third dimension in quantum confinement of surface electrons.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Control of lysosome function by the GTPase-activating protein TBC1D9B and its binding partner TMEM55B.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Local PI(4,5)P<sub>2</sub> synthesis by septin-associated PIPKIγ isoforms controls centralspindlin association with the midbody during cytokinesis.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Broadband near-infrared hyperbolic polaritons in MoOCl<sub>2</sub>.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Serendipitous and Systematic Chemoproteomic Discovery of MBLAC2, HINT1, and NME1-4 Inhibitors from Histone Deacetylase-Targeting Pharmacophores.

ACS chemical biology·2025
Same author

Next-generation small molecule inhibitors of clathrin function acutely inhibit endocytosis.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

Ultrafast spin dynamics including spin-orbit interaction in semiconductors.

Michael Krauss1, Martin Aeschlimann, Hans Christian Schneider

  • 1Physics Department and Research Center OPTIMAS, University of Kaiserslautern, P.O. Box 3049, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany. mkrauss@physik.uni-kl.de

Physical Review Letters
|July 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study investigates ultrafast spin dynamics in semiconductors, revealing spin-relaxation times for holes in gallium arsenide (GaAs) that match experimental data. Different optical methods yield distinct results for hole-spin dynamics, unlike electron-spin dynamics.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing
15:58

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing

Published on: December 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing
15:58

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing

Published on: December 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Solid State Physics
  • Quantum Mechanics
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Ultrafast spin-dependent carrier dynamics are crucial for semiconductor spintronics.
  • Strong spin-orbit coupling significantly influences carrier behavior in semiconductors.
  • Gallium arsenide (GaAs) serves as a model system for studying hole-spin dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To theoretically investigate ultrafast spin-dependent carrier dynamics in semiconductors.
  • To model these dynamics using holes in bulk GaAs, considering strong spin-orbit coupling.
  • To compute microscopic carrier dynamics within the anisotropic hole-band structure.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical computation of microscopic carrier dynamics.
  • Inclusion of spin-orbit coupling in the anisotropic hole-band structure model.
  • Quantitative comparison of computed spin-relaxation times with experimental data.

Main Results:

  • Achieved quantitative agreement between computed and measured hole-spin relaxation times in GaAs.
  • Demonstrated that different optical measurement techniques yield varying results for hole-spin dynamics.
  • Highlighted a contrast in measurement outcomes between hole-spin and electron-spin dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • The theoretical model accurately predicts hole-spin relaxation times in GaAs.
  • Optical measurement techniques are sensitive to specific aspects of hole-spin dynamics.
  • Understanding these differences is vital for advancing semiconductor spintronics.