Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Should we train the trainers? Results of a randomized trial
Michael A Murphy1, Simon Neequaye, Simon Kreckler
1University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Background:
The development of efficient training methods in surgery is increasingly important. The effectiveness of training trainers is unclear. This study was designed to determine the effect on their trainees' performance of instructing trainers in a specific cognitive training method.
Study Design:
Ten trainers from a university teaching hospital were randomized to train novices on a one-to-one basis in a simulated procedure using either a four-step cognitive method or their own unspecified method. Thirty trainees were randomly assigned to either a cognitive or standard trainer. After training, trainees were assessed on performing the procedure using a task-specific checklist, a global rating scale, and time taken to complete the procedure.
Results:
Trainees who were trained using the specific cognitive method completed the procedure in a faster time (mean 331 seconds [SD 37 seconds] versus 426 seconds [SD 66 seconds]) and with higher global rating scores (mean 23.25 seconds [SD 3.7 seconds] versus 20.5 seconds [SD 4.5 seconds]) compared with those taught by a standard method.
Conclusions:
Instructing trainers in a cognitive training method results in a significant improvement in training outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Regression Toward the Mean
Group Design
What is an Experiment?
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
