Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Use of Capillary Aerosol Generator in Continuous Production of Controlled Aerosol for Non-Clinical Studies
Published on: April 12, 2022
Application of a data-processing model to determine the optimal sampling conditions for liquid phase trapping of
V Perraud1, S François, H Wortham
1Laboratoire de Chimie et Environnement, Université de Provence, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille cedex 03, France. veronique.perraud@univ-provence.fr
Abstract:
The reactivity of two fluorescent derivatization reagents, 2-diphenyl-1,3-indandione-1-hydrazone (DIH) and 2-aminooxy-N-[3-(5-dimethylamino-naphtalene-1-sulfonamino)-propyl]-acetamide (dansylacetamidooxyamine, DNSAOA), was studied towards selected atmospheric carbonyl compounds. The results were compared to those obtained using the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH) UV-vis reagent, a standard well-established technique used to detect atmospheric carbonyl compounds. The experimental rate constant were integrated into a data-processing model developed in the laboratory to simulate the trapping efficiencies of a mist chamber device as a function of temperature, reagent and solvent type among others. The results showed that in an aqueous solution, DNSAOA exhibits a higher reactivity towards carbonyl compounds without the addition of an acidic catalyst than 2,4-DNPH. It was observed that DNSAOA can trap efficiently water-soluble gaseous compounds (for example formaldehyde). However, because of a high initial contamination of the reagent caused by the synthesis procedure used in this work, DNSAOA cannot be used in high concentrations. As a result, very low trapping efficiencies of less reactive water-insoluble gaseous compounds (acetone) using DNSAOA are observed. However, the use of an organic solvent such as acetonitrile improved the trapping efficiencies of the carbonyl compounds. In this case, using DIH as the derivatization reagent (DNSAOA is not soluble in acetonitrile), trapping efficiencies greater than 95% were obtained, similar to 2,4-DNPH. Moreover, fluorescence associated with DIH derivatives (detection limits 3.33 x 10(-8)M and 1.72x10(-8)M for formaldehyde and acetone, respectively) is further advantage of this method for the determination of carbonyl compounds in complex matrix compared to the classical UV-vis detection method (detection limits 3.20 x 10(-8)M and 2.9 x 10(-8)M for formaldehyde and acetone, respectively).
More Related Videos
12:11Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
08:43PTR-ToF-MS Coupled with an Automated Sampling System and Tailored Data Analysis for Food Studies: Bioprocess Monitoring, Screening and Nose-space Analysis
Published on: May 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Overview
Bulk or large solid samples are typically reduced in size using grinding, crushing, or milling techniques to increase the...