Related Experiment Videos
Comparing the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with the Short Form-36 preference-based SF-6D in chronic kidney
Sara N Davison1, Gian S Jhangri, David H Feeny
1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. sara.davison@ualberta.ca
Insights
The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and SF-6D provide different health scores for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The HUI3 is better for assessing severe disability in CKD populations.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Health Economics
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is crucial for managing chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- Preference-based outcome measures (PROMs) like the SF-6D and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) are used to assess HRQoL.
- Understanding agreement and discriminative abilities of these PROMs in CKD is essential for accurate health assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess within-subject agreement between the SF-6D and HUI3.
- To compare the discriminative abilities of the SF-6D and HUI3 in patients with CKD.
- To evaluate the suitability of SF-6D and HUI3 for different patient severities.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 185 incident patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD.
- Self-completion of the SF-6D (derived from the Short Form-36) and the HUI3.
- Analysis included correlation, intraclass correlation, and examination of floor/ceiling effects and discrimination between subgroups.
Main Results:
- SF-6D yielded higher mean scores (0.67) than HUI3 (0.58) (P < 0.01).
- Strong association (r=0.55) but moderate agreement (ICC=0.44) between SF-6D and HUI3.
- HUI3 better captured severe illness burden and depressive symptoms; SF-6D better captured upper-range differences.
Conclusions:
- SF-6D and HUI3 generate distinct scores in CKD patients; direct comparison requires caution.
- HUI3 is more suitable for populations with greater disability, such as CKD patients.
- Further research needed to assess longitudinal changes in preference scores within each instrument.
Objective:
Assess within-subject agreement and compare discriminative abilities between the SF-6D and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Methods:
The HUI3 and Short Form-36 were self-completed by 185 CKD patients enrolled in a prospective study of incident patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD.
Results:
The mean preference-based score for the SF-6D was 0.67 +/- 0.13 compared to 0.58 +/- 0.26 for the HUI3 (P < 0.01). There was a strong association between SF-6D and HUI3 scores (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.65) and moderate agreement with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.44. The HUI3 was better able to capture more severe burden of illness with fewer floor effects. The SF-6D was better at capturing differences among patients at the top range of the scale with fewer ceiling effects. Both the HUI3 and SF-6D were able to discriminate between patient groups differing in disease severity defined as predialysis versus dialysis dependent and depressive symptoms using a Beck Depression Inventory II score of >or=14 as the cutoff. The HUI3 was better able to discriminate greater depressive symptoms.
Conclusion:
The SF-6D and the HUI3 generate different preference-based scores for patients with CKD and any comparison between their scores should be made with caution. The HUI3 appears more suitable for measuring the health of populations with greater disability such as patients with CKD. It remains to be determined whether these differences will remain when one compares within-instrument differences in preference scores over time.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test