Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Everyday diagnostics--a critique of the Bayesian model.

N E Jonson1

  • 1Surgical Department, Central Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Medical Hypotheses
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Bayesian methods in clinical diagnostics are not fully applicable due to a lack of randomness and ethical concerns in utility evaluation. Clinicians still require careful decision supervision, suggesting a need for alternative models.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Popperian everyday diagnostics--the growth of diagnostic knowledge in the particular case.

Medical hypotheses·1990
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Decision Making
  • Clinical Diagnostics
  • Bayesian Statistics

Background:

  • Bayesian probability calculus and decision procedures have been increasingly recommended for clinical medicine.
  • The application of these methods in everyday diagnostics requires careful examination of their alignment with real-world clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the conditions required for Bayesian probability calculus and decision procedures are met in everyday clinical diagnostics.
  • To identify discrepancies between the theoretical models and the practical realities of clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the applicability of Bayesian methods in the context of clinical diagnostics.
  • Examination of the requirements for probability calculus, specifically strict randomness.
  • Evaluation of the challenges in assessing utility in clinical decision-making.

Main Results:

  • Everyday clinical diagnostics does not meet the strict conditions required for Bayesian probability calculus, particularly regarding randomness.
  • The evaluation of utility in clinical decisions is often disputable and potentially unethical.
  • Measures to reconcile model discrepancies are resource-intensive and insufficient to replace clinician oversight.

Conclusions:

  • Current Bayesian models are not fully adequate for everyday clinical diagnostics due to fundamental discrepancies with clinical reality.
  • Clinicians must continue to carefully supervise the outcomes of their decisions.
  • There is a need for the development of alternative methods and models better suited to the complexities of clinical practice.

Related Experiment Videos