Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

19:57
An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
[Changes in HIV testing in Brazil between 1998 and 2005]
Ivan França Junior1, Gabriela Calazans, Eliana Miura Zucchi
1Departamento de Saúde Materno-Infantil, Faculdade de Saúde Públic, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. ifjunior@usp.br
Revista De Saude Publica
|July 29, 2008
Summary
HIV testing increased in Brazil, primarily among women and socioeconomically advantaged groups. However, this scale-up lacked equitable access and adequate counseling for all individuals.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Social Sciences
Background:
- HIV testing is a critical component of HIV prevention and care.
- Understanding trends and disparities in HIV testing is essential for public health interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze changes in HIV testing rates in urban Brazil between 1998 and 2005.
- To identify sociodemographic factors associated with HIV testing.
- To examine reasons for testing and counseling adequacy.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional studies in urban Brazil (1998, 2005) with representative samples of adults aged 16-65.
- Data collection included sociodemographic, sexual, reproductive, and health characteristics.
- Statistical analysis using Pearson's chi-square and design-based F test.
Main Results:
- HIV testing increased from 20.2% in 1998 to 33.6% in 2005.
- Testing was higher among women aged 25-34, but lower for those with early sexual initiation or multiple partners.
- Increases in testing among men were limited to specific age groups and socioeconomic factors; testing did not rise in high-risk groups.
- Prenatal HIV testing increased for women, while work-related testing decreased for men.
- In 2005, 50% of those tested received inadequate counseling.
Conclusions:
- HIV testing scale-up in Brazil was unequal, benefiting women of childbearing age, adults, and those with higher socioeconomic status.
- While testing rates rose, the expansion did not ensure informed choice or sufficient quality counseling.
- Addressing disparities and improving counseling quality are crucial for effective HIV testing programs.

