Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Fibrillatory rate response to candesartan in persistent atrial fibrillation
Andreas Bollmann1, Arnljot Tveit, Daniela Husser
1Department of Cardiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. andreas.bollmann@kard.lu.se
Insights
Candesartan reduced atrial fibrillation (AF) fibrillatory rate in patients with high baseline rates, but did not improve cardioversion success. Lower fibrillatory rates (<360 fpm) predicted successful cardioversion but not AF recurrence.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) may have anti-arrhythmic effects in atrial fibrillation (AF).
- The precise mechanisms by which ARBs influence AF and cardioversion outcomes remain incompletely understood.
- This study investigated candesartan's impact on AF fibrillatory rate and its relationship with cardioversion success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if candesartan reduces atrial fibrillatory rate in patients with persistent AF.
- To determine if fibrillatory rate and its response to candesartan correlate with cardioversion outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A post hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled CAPRAF trial was conducted.
- Patients received either candesartan 8 mg daily or placebo, without other anti-arrhythmic drugs.
- Fibrillatory rate was measured using ECG lead V1 via spatiotemporal QRST cancellation and time-frequency analysis.
Main Results:
- Candesartan significantly reduced fibrillatory rate (399 vs. 388 fpm, P=0.04), while placebo did not (402 vs. 402 fpm, P=0.986).
- This reduction was significant only in patients with high baseline fibrillatory rates (>420 fpm).
- Successful cardioversion was achieved in 100% of patients with on-treatment rates <360 fpm, versus 83% with higher rates (P=0.02).
Conclusions:
- Candesartan decreases the fibrillatory rate in persistent AF, primarily in patients with high baseline rates.
- This effect of candesartan on fibrillatory rate is not associated with improved cardioversion success.
- Fibrillatory rates below 360 fpm correlate with successful cardioversion but not with reduced AF recurrence.
Introduction:
Angiotensin-receptor blockers may exert favourable anti-arrhythmic effects in atrial fibrillation (AF), but their mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that (i) candesartan reduces atrial fibrillatory rate and (ii) fibrillatory rate and its response to candesartan are related with the outcome of cardioversion. For this purpose, a post hoc subanalysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled CAPRAF (Candesartan in the Prevention of Relapsing Atrial Fibrillation) trial was performed.
Methods And Results:
Patients with AF undergoing electrical cardioversion were randomized to receive candesartan 8 mg once daily (n = 58) or matching placebo (n = 66) and no additional class I or III anti-arrhythmic drugs. Fibrillatory rate was determined from ECG lead V1 at baseline and at the day of cardioversion using spatiotemporal QRST cancellation and time-frequency analysis. The median time on treatment was 29 days. Candesartan reduced fibrillatory rate [399 +/- 48 vs. 388 +/- 49 fibrillations/min (fpm), P = 0.04], but not placebo (402 +/- 58 vs. 402 +/- 61 fpm, P = 0.986). Candesartan effects were only observed if the baseline fibrillatory rate was high [>420 fpm: 445 +/- 21 vs. 415 +/- 49 fpm, P = 0.006 vs. intermediate (360-420 fpm): 397 +/- 19 vs. 391 +/- 37 fpm, P = 0.351 vs. low (<360 fpm): 326 +/- 26 vs. 338 +/- 29 fpm, P = 0.179]. Cardioversion success was 100% in patients with an on-treatment rate <360 fpm vs. 83% in patients with higher rates (P = 0.02). Risk for AF recurrence was similar in patients with low (64%), intermediate (75%), or high on-treatment rates (63%, P = 0.446) and was also independent of candesartan effects on the fibrillatory rate.
Conclusion:
In patients with persistent AF, candesartan decreases the fibrillatory rate, but this effect is restricted to patients with high baseline fibrillatory rates and is not associated with improved cardioversion outcome. Fibrillatory rates <360 fpm are associated with successful cardioversion, but not with AF recurrence.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
