Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
Language Development01:22

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transcriptomic Analysis and Physiological Indicators Synthetically Uncover Candidate Genes Regulating Polyembryony Formation of <i>Phoebe bournei</i> Seeds.

Biology·2026
Same author

Sarcopenia-associated traits and sepsis risk: a Mendelian Randomization and Prospective Observational Study.

Shock (Augusta, Ga.)·2026
Same author

Experience of Responding to Imaginative Suggestions: A Micro-Phenomenological Interview Exploratory Study.

The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis·2026
Same author

Tibialis anterior pennation angle at ICU admission and 60-day mortality in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Improving Plasma-Catalytic Ammonia Synthesis Using a Coaxial Double-Helix-Electrode Reactor.

ChemSusChem·2026
Same author

Temporal signatures of thought-neurodynamics distinguish on- and off-task thoughts.

Communications biology·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning.

Lulu Wan1, Zoltán Dienes, Xiaolan Fu

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.

Consciousness and Cognition
|August 1, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Implicit learning relies on familiarity, which is thought to be intention-independent. This study shows familiarity is sensitive to intentions, aiding in grammar discrimination.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Implicit Learning

Background:

  • Implicit learning is often assumed to be driven by familiarity.
  • Familiarity is typically considered unaffected by conscious intentions.
  • This leads to the expectation that familiarity cannot guide selective learning between different implicit grammars.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether familiarity, influenced by intentions, can be used to distinguish between implicitly learned grammars.
  • To examine the role of subjective familiarity in strategic control during implicit learning tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted where participants learned two distinct grammars.
  • Participants were then asked to identify strings belonging to only one of the learned grammars.
  • Subjective familiarity ratings and self-reported strategy use were collected for each string.

Main Results:

  • Participants successfully endorsed strings from one grammar while ignoring strings from the other.
  • When participants reported using familiarity, strings consistent with their chosen grammar were rated as significantly more familiar than those from the other grammar.
  • Subjective familiarity was demonstrably sensitive to the participants' intentions.

Conclusions:

  • Familiarity is not solely an automatic byproduct of learning; it is sensitive to intentional control.
  • Subjective familiarity can be strategically employed to guide behavior and discriminate between implicitly learned categories.
  • These findings challenge the traditional view of implicit learning and highlight the role of intention in modulating familiarity-based judgments.