Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Five-Factor Theory of Personality
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent thinkers. Low...
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Test for Homogeneity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Oral reading fluency as a predictor of neuropsychological test performance: Evidence from Hungarian language.
Detection and identification of highly antigenic proteins from cytoskeleton of Toxoplasma gondii by immune-proteomics.
Cross-cultural comparison of performance on the multicultural neuropsychological scale between participants from Argentina and the United States of America.
Cross-cultural comparison of the performance on the Five-Point test between highly educated comparable samples of Argentina and South Africa.
Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology: International diversity perspectives.
Clinical neuropsychological evaluation of patients referred from a post-COVID subspeciality clinic.
Cardiometabolic burden and cognitive profiles in adults 55.
Unraveling delusional misidentification: A neuropsychological and experimental exploration of a new case of reduplication syndrome.
Characteristics and clinical correlates of objective medication adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment.
Concordance between domain-based neuropsychological profiles and clinical phenotypes in young-onset dementia.
Exploring the relationship between self-report and performance-based measures of impulsivity.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Reliability of the Five-Point Test.
Alberto Luis Fernandez1, Matías A Moroni, Juan Manuel Carranza
1Department of Neuropsychology, Catholic University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina. neurorehab@onenet.com.ar
The Five-Point Test (FPT) shows acceptable internal consistency and stability for unique designs but low reliability for perseverative errors in healthy adults. Further validation is needed for the perseverative error measure.
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- The Five-Point Test (FPT) is a non-verbal fluency measure.
- It is utilized for assessing executive functions, particularly in cases of suspected frontal lobe damage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the internal consistency of the FPT.
- To assess the temporal stability (test-retest reliability) of the FPT.
Main Methods:
- Internal consistency was examined using split-half analysis in 209 healthy participants.
- Test-retest reliability was assessed with 142 healthy participants over a mean interval of 37.8 days.
Main Results:
- Internal consistency: r = .80 for unique designs, r = .48 for perseverative errors.
- Test-retest reliability: r = .78 for unique designs, r = .51 for perseverative errors.
- Significant differences in unique designs were observed between administrations, but not for perseverative errors.
Conclusions:
- The FPT demonstrates acceptable internal consistency and stability for unique designs.
- The reliability of the perseverative error measure in the FPT is low and requires further investigation.

