Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing a system for surgical audit.

R A Pettigrew1, J R McDonald, A M van Rij

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery
|August 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of three targeted approaches to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on cardiovascular risk.

The British journal of surgery·2016
Same author

Aortic aneurysm screening.

The British journal of surgery·2015
Same author

Endothelial cell icam-1 staining in human carotid arteries.

Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology·2015
Same author

Twenty-eight loci that influence serum urate levels: analysis of association with gout.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2014
Same author

A patient with acute liver failure and extreme hypoglycaemia with lactic acidosis who was not in a coma: causes and consequences of lactate-protected hypoglycaemia.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2014
Same author

Evaluation of the accuracy of aorta scan BVI 9600 in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2014
Same journal

The Experimental Application of Microsurgical Techniques to Internal Mammary to Coronary Artery Anastomosis.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·2018
Same journal

The Use of Trimethoprim-Sulphamethoxazole in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·2018
Same journal

The Bairnsdale Ulcer.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·2018
Same journal

Aorto-Caval Fistula: Successful Management of Two Cases.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·2018
Same journal

Subdural Empyema.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·2018
Same journal

Massive Ascites Due to Pancreatic Stones.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·2018
See all related articles

This study details a surgical audit system developed over six years in a teaching hospital. Key improvements focused on essential data collection and user incentives, enhancing quality assurance and training.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Quality Improvement
  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Auditing

Background:

  • Surgical audit systems are crucial for maintaining and improving patient care standards.
  • Developing and refining such systems requires significant time and iterative adjustments.
  • Teaching hospitals present unique challenges and opportunities for implementing audit processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a comprehensive surgical audit system developed over a six-year period.
  • To identify key lessons learned from refining a computerized audit process.
  • To highlight the system's utility in quality assurance, surgical training, and departmental management.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a surgical audit system within an active surgical unit over six years.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review and modification of computerized audit processes and software after an initial three-year period.
  • Incorporation of essential data collection, integration with existing practices, consultant data verification, and user incentives.

    • Main Results:

    • Major modifications to the audit system were implemented following a review of the initial three years.
    • The refined system emphasizes collecting only essential data, aligning with departmental practices.
    • Consultant verification of data and user incentives were identified as critical components.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed surgical audit system is a valuable resource for quality assurance in surgical departments.
    • The system effectively supports surgical training and departmental management.
    • Lessons learned emphasize practicality, data verification, and user engagement for successful audit implementation.