Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
[The digitalis: should we forget it?]
Salvatore Greco1, Lanfranco Antonini, Antonio Auriti
1Dipartimento di Malattie Cardiache, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, Roma. salvatore.greco@gmail.com
Insights
Digitalis remains effective for heart failure treatment, despite declining prescriptions. Optimal blood levels (digoxinemia) of 0.5-0.9 ng/ml show mortality benefits, warranting updated treatment guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Digitalis has been a cornerstone treatment for heart failure and atrial fibrillation for over two centuries.
- Prescription rates for digitalis have significantly declined, contrasting with newer cardiovascular medications.
- The declining commercial interest from pharmaceutical companies impacts the perceived value and research into digitalis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the efficacy of digitalis in treating heart failure.
- To analyze the impact of digoxin blood levels on patient outcomes.
- To advocate for updated clinical guidelines regarding digitalis prescription and therapeutic ranges.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of prescription trends from the IN-CHF Italian registry (1995-2005).
- Review of the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial (1997) findings.
- Evaluation of post-hoc analyses examining the relationship between digoxinemia and mortality.
Main Results:
- Digitalis prescriptions decreased from 63.3% (1995-1999) to 40% (2000-2005).
- The DIG trial demonstrated no mortality benefit but reduced hospital admissions for heart failure.
- Post-hoc analyses indicated improved mortality with digoxinemia levels between 0.5-0.9 ng/ml.
Conclusions:
- Digitalis should continue to be considered an effective treatment for heart failure.
- Current prescription practices and therapeutic digoxinemia ranges require updating.
- Evidence supports the benefit of digitalis at specific blood concentrations, particularly for reducing hospitalizations and potentially improving survival.
Abstract:
For more than 200 years digitalis has been considered of paramount importance in the treatment of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The IN-CHF Italian registry shows that prescriptions were reduced from 63.3% in the period 1995-1999 to 40% in the period 2000-2005, a very different trend compared to prescriptions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists, and beta-blockers. The commercial value of digitalis is much lower than other drugs and it does not seem to be of interest for the pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, this is a logical trend in the business world. For many years the major indications of digitalis have been heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The most important study on efficacy of digitalis in the treatment of heart failure was the DIG trial (1997), which showed no difference in mortality when compared to placebo but significant beneficial effects in reducing hospital admission rates. Many post-hoc researches evaluated blood levels of digitalis and proved beneficial effects also on mortality when digoxinemia values were 0.5-0.9 ng/ml. In conclusion, digitalis should still be considered effective for the treatment of heart failure; therefore prescription modality as well as the range of normal values of digoxinemia should be updated.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management