On the origins of emergent differential sample behavior
Peter J Urcuioli1, Marco Vasconcelos
1Purdue University, Department of Psychological Sciences, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081, USA. uche@psych.purdue.edu
Abstract:
Two experiments evaluated the source(s) of emergent differential sample behavior in pigeons. Initially, pigeons learned two-sample, two-alternative symbolic matching in which different patterns of sample responding were required to produce the comparisons. Afterwards, two other samples nominally identical to the comparisons were added to the matching task. On new-sample trials, completion of either sample-response requirement produced comparison alternatives which were either the same as or different from the alternatives on the familiar-sample trials. Differential responding to the new samples developed only when the comparisons were the same as the familiar samples. The results are consistent with acquired sample equivalence and adventitious reinforcement accounts of emergent sample behavior and are inconsistent with bidirectional transfer (symmetry) between the response patterns explicitly required to the originally trained (familiar) samples and the subsequently reinforced comparisons.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Methods: Overview
In analytical chemistry, the choice of sampling...
Sampling Theorem
Partial Differential Equations
Entropy Changes Accompanying Specific Processes
Nonconscious Mimicry
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...


