Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Central Limit Theorem01:14

Central Limit Theorem

The central limit theorem, abbreviated as clt, is one of the most powerful and useful ideas in all of statistics. The central limit theorem for sample means says that if you repeatedly draw samples of a given size and calculate their means, and create a histogram of those means, then the resulting histogram will tend to have an approximate normal bell shape. In other words, as sample sizes increase, the distribution of means follows the normal distribution more closely.
The sample size, n, that...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comprehensive assessment of lifecourse and mortality of Parkinson's disease in the German National Cohort.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Intersectional inequalities in self-rated health in Germany across sex/gender, migration, education and income: a cross-sectional study.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
Same author

Ascertainment of Cancer Cases in the German National Cohort (NAKO): Methods and Initial Results.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same author

Associations of the Lifestyle for Brain Health (LIBRA) index with cognitive functioning across adulthood: Variation by sex and socioeconomic status in the German National Cohort (NAKO).

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Prevalence and determinants of sacroiliac joint bone marrow oedema in the general population in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional study.

The Lancet. Rheumatology·2026
Same author

Sex-dependent associations of childhood maltreatment with obesity-related traits: results from the German National Cohort (NAKO).

International journal of obesity (2005)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Regression toward the mean--a detection method for unknown population mean based on Mee and Chua's algorithm.

Thomas Ostermann1, Stefan N Willich, Rainer Lüdtke

  • 1Department of Medical Theory and Complementary Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Gerhard-Kienle-Weg 4, 58313 Herdecke, Germany. thomaso@uni-wh.de

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|August 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Regression to the mean (RTM) can distort results in uncontrolled studies. This new statistical method helps differentiate true treatment effects from RTM when the population mean is unknown, improving study interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Regression to the mean (RTM) is a statistical phenomenon where extreme measurements tend to be followed by measurements closer to the population mean.
  • In uncontrolled studies, RTM can be erroneously interpreted as a genuine treatment effect, compromising study validity.
  • Existing statistical methods for RTM often assume a known population mean, limiting their applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend existing statistical approaches for analyzing regression to the mean (RTM) in situations with an unknown population mean.
  • To develop a method for estimating the range of population means where true treatment effects can be distinguished from RTM.
  • To provide a tool for more accurate interpretation of results from uncontrolled studies.

Main Methods:

  • The study extends the Mee and Chua algorithm by systematically varying the population mean (μ) over a range of plausible values.
  • Differential calculus was employed to derive formulas for estimating treatment effects in the presence of RTM with an unknown μ.
  • The developed method was applied to three real-world case studies.

Main Results:

  • The method successfully identified scenarios where no treatment effect could be confirmed, irrespective of the true population mean (μ).
  • It also identified situations where a treatment effect was consistently observed across different plausible values of μ.
  • The approach proved effective in appraising the results of uncontrolled studies, aiding in the interpretation of potential treatment effects.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed statistical method effectively distinguishes true treatment effects from regression to the mean (RTM) when the population mean is unknown.
  • This approach is valuable for critically evaluating uncontrolled observational studies.
  • It can enhance the reliability of evidence presented in meta-analyses, health technology reports, and systematic reviews.