Related Experiment Videos
Higher risk factor burden and worse outcomes in urban carotid endarterectomy patients
Seemant Chaturvedi1, Ramesh Madhavan, Sunitha Santhakumar
1Stroke Program and the Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. SChaturv@med.wayne.edu
Insights
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) outcomes in urban hospitals were worse than in prior trials due to sicker patients. These findings highlight the need to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of CEA in diverse urban populations.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Clinical Outcomes Research
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Previous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) trials utilized strict inclusion criteria, limiting representation of diverse patient populations.
- Urban hospital cohorts often exhibit a higher prevalence of comorbidities and underrepresented racial groups compared to historical trial participants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if CEA outcomes in two urban hospitals align with findings from previous multicenter trials.
- To assess the impact of patient comorbidities and demographics on CEA efficacy in an urban setting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of CEA procedures conducted in 2003-2004 at two urban hospitals.
- Analysis of demographic data, medical history, and perioperative complications (stroke, myocardial infarction [MI]).
- Comparison of observed complication rates against expected rates derived from prior multicenter trial data.
Main Results:
- The study cohort presented with significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, Black race, and advanced age compared to previous trials.
- Observed stroke rates (4.7%) were not significantly different from expected (3.1%), but myocardial infarction (MI) and composite stroke or MI rates were significantly higher.
- Black patients experienced a higher stroke or MI rate (15.4%) compared to other groups, particularly at the hospital with lower CEA volume.
Conclusions:
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) outcomes in these urban hospitals were poorer than anticipated based on prior multicenter trials.
- Higher rates of comorbidities and demographic differences in the urban cohort likely contributed to the observed disparities in outcomes.
- Careful consideration of the risk-benefit ratio is crucial for CEA in urban patients due to their complex medical profiles and associated worse outcomes.
Background And Purpose:
Previous multicenter carotid endarterectomy (CEA) studies had screening criteria for patient comorbidities and very few blacks. We assessed the hypothesis that CEA results from two urban hospitals would approximate those of the previous multicenter trials.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review was completed at two urban hospitals for CEA procedures done in 2003 and 2004. Demographic information and past medical history was recorded. In hospital perioperative complications (stroke or myocardial infarction [MI]) were noted. We calculated an expected perioperative stroke rate based on trial figures and our proportion of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Results:
Patients in our cohort had significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, black race, and elderly status compared to previous trials. The expected perioperative stroke was 3.1%, and the observed stroke rate was 4.7% (P=0.36). Observed rates of MI (6.7%, P<0.001)) and stroke or MI (11.3%, P<0.0001) were higher than expected based on the previous trials. The stroke or MI rate in black subjects was higher (15.4% versus 5.6%, P=0.065) and this was significant at the hospital with lower CEA volume.
Conclusions:
In two urban hospitals, CEA results were significantly worse than previous trials. Patient selection is likely to play a role because our cohort had higher numbers of hypertensives, diabetics, smokers, blacks, and elderly patients. Clinicians need to carefully consider the risk/benefit ratio of CEA in urban patients because our study shows that these patients have a large number of medical comorbidities and worse outcomes after CEA.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures