Oral-motor dysfunction at 10 months corrected gestational age in infants born less than 37 weeks preterm

Charlotte A Buswell1, Paula Leslie, Nicholas D Embleton

  • 1Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust (NHS), Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Charlotte.Buswell@nuth.nhs.uk

Dysphagia
|August 9, 2008
PubMed

Insights

Oral-motor dysfunction can affect preterm infants even in later infancy. This feeding issue was observed in some infants, but not predicted by common neonatal risk factors.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Neonatology
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Background:

  • Feeding difficulties are prevalent in preterm infants, impacting nutrition, growth, and parental well-being.
  • While oral-motor dysfunction is known in early infancy, its occurrence in later infancy with varied food consistencies is less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the prevalence of oral-motor dysfunction in preterm infants at 10 months corrected gestational age.
  • To investigate potential links between oral-motor dysfunction and neonatal risk factors like gestational age, oxygen use, and feeding establishment time.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 15 preterm infants (born <37 weeks gestational age) was assessed at 10 months corrected gestational age.
  • The Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment, a validated tool, was used to evaluate feeding-related oral-motor function.
  • Infants' neonatal histories, including gestational age and oxygen requirements, were reviewed.

Main Results:

  • Oral-motor dysfunction was identified in 3 out of 15 preterm infants.
  • All affected infants were born after 31 weeks gestational age.
  • No significant associations were found between oral-motor dysfunction and the studied neonatal risk factors.

Conclusions:

  • Oral-motor dysfunction can manifest in preterm infants during later infancy.
  • Current neonatal risk factors do not reliably predict the presence of later infancy oral-motor dysfunction.
  • Further research is needed to establish the prevalence and clinical significance of oral-motor dysfunction in this population.