Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
The definition of non-responder to multiple sclerosis treatment: neuroimaging markers
1Multiple Sclerosis Unit IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente, Fondazione Don Gnocchi, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy. mrovaris@dongnocchi.it
Abstract:
MRI is the main paraclinical tool used both to diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS) and to evaluate the efficacy of experimental treatments in phase II and III clinical trials. In the latter context, a major issue is represented by the weak correlations found between clinical and MRI aspects in the case of established MS, which are particularly evident when individual patients are considered. As a consequence, the definition of response to MS treatment, when based upon MRI aspects, remains a challenging task. Although the use of MRI-derived quantities to define treatment options and strategies at an individual patient level is supported by recent evidence, only the integration of clinical and MRI data can be considered a reliable approach for the work-up of patients undergoing disease-modifying treatments.
Insights
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) aids multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and treatment evaluation. Integrating clinical and MRI data is crucial for assessing treatment response in individual patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and assessing treatment efficacy in clinical trials.
- Weak correlations between clinical symptoms and MRI findings in established MS pose challenges for treatment response evaluation.
- Defining treatment response based solely on MRI metrics remains difficult for individual patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the challenges in evaluating MS treatment response using MRI.
- To emphasize the need for integrated clinical and MRI data in patient management.
Main Methods:
- Review of current practices in MS diagnosis and treatment evaluation using MRI.
- Analysis of the limitations of MRI in correlating with clinical status in established MS.
- Discussion of evidence supporting the integration of clinical and MRI data.
Main Results:
- MRI is a primary tool for MS diagnosis and clinical trial assessment.
- Clinical and MRI data show weak correlations in established MS, complicating treatment response definition.
- Recent evidence supports using MRI-derived metrics for individual patient treatment strategies.
Conclusions:
- The integration of clinical and MRI data is essential for reliable patient work-up in MS.
- A combined approach is necessary for effective management of patients undergoing disease-modifying treatments for MS.
Related Concept Videos
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Multiple Sclerosis l: Introduction

