Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cluster randomized controlled trial of decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention, MiCHOICE.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Role of electronic health record in stigma experiences, trust, and care decisions by women with history of pregnancy and substance use disorder: a qualitative study of perceptions of clinical note language.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

A real-world feasibility evaluation of LLM-based clinical prediction: emergency department return visit admission across two academic medical centers.

Research square·2026
Same author

Outcomes of 72-hour emergency department return visits requiring hospital admission in older adults: a nationally representative analysis.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Patient-reported outcomes for monitoring substance use treatment: A systematic review of single-item measures.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Impact of telehealth genetic counseling on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates among multi-ethnic breast cancer patients.

npj women's health·2026
Same journal

Sensitivity Analyses of a Scoring System for a Contraception Decision Aid.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Improving electronic health record processing of large language models via retrieval-augmented generation: A case study on dietary supplements.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Developing a User-Centered Mobile Application Prototype: Bridging Lower-Limb Fracture Care from Skilled Nursing Facility and Back to the Community.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

KERAP: A Knowledge-Enhanced Reasoning Approach for Accurate Zero-shot Diagnosis Prediction Using Multi-agent LLMs.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Automating Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events Using Large Language Models.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Predictive Factors and State-Level Barriers to Postpartum Birth Control Usage in the United States: Insights from PRAMS Phase 8.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

A combined qualitative method for testing an interactive risk communication tool.

Jessica S Ancker1, Rita Kukafka

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, USA.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
|August 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an interactive game to improve understanding of health risks, moving beyond static text and graphics. Community input guided development, showing games have greater emotional impact than traditional risk communication methods.

More Related Videos

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
04:54

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
04:54

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Health Communication
  • Cognitive Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Traditional methods of describing health risks (text, numbers, graphics) often lead to comprehension difficulties.
  • Effective risk communication is crucial for public health decision-making and understanding.
  • Existing risk communication tools may not adequately convey the probabilistic nature of health events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a novel, game-like risk communication tool grounded in cognitive theory.
  • To explore the effectiveness of interactive experiences versus static graphics in conveying health risk probability.
  • To incorporate community perspectives into the software development process for real-world applicability.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative method combining focus groups and scenario-based usability testing was employed.
  • Community-based participatory research was conducted in Harlem, NY.
  • A facilitator mediated discussions between software developers and community participants.

Main Results:

  • The interactive game elicited an emotional impact not observed with static graphics.
  • Community input provided valuable guidance for software development.
  • The qualitative method facilitated understanding of lay models of health risk.

Conclusions:

  • Interactive, game-like tools show promise for enhancing health risk communication.
  • Community-based participatory research is effective in guiding the development of user-centered health technologies.
  • Further testing is needed to refine the tool and deepen the understanding of public health risk perception.