Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Impact of interventricular lead distance and the decrease in septal-to-lateral delay on response to cardiac
Sandra Buck1, Alexander H Maass, Wybe Nieuwland
1Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) success involves lead placement. A larger interlead distance and reduced septal-to-lateral delay predict positive CRT response in heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is crucial for advanced chronic heart failure with electrical dyssynchrony.
- Despite established criteria, 20-40% of patients do not respond to CRT, necessitating further optimization strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how interlead distance and lead positioning influence CRT success.
- To identify predictors of CRT response in patients with heart failure and dyssynchrony.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 174 CRT-implanted patients, defining response as a >=10% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume after 6 months.
- Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of CRT response.
Main Results:
- Responders (55%) showed a significantly larger horizontal interlead distance (OR 2.8) and greater septal-to-lateral delay reduction (62 vs. 26 ms).
- Other predictors included non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, smaller LV end-diastolic diameter, ACE inhibitor use, and no tricuspid insufficiency.
- A septal-to-lateral delay >60 ms was a strong predictor of response (OR 4.9).
Conclusions:
- A larger interlead distance, often indicating posterior left ventricular lead placement, is associated with CRT response.
- Diminishing intraventricular delay, specifically septal-to-lateral delay, is a key predictor of successful CRT outcomes.
Aims:
To investigate the influence of interlead distance and lead positioning on success of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with advanced chronic heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony. Despite application of established selection criteria, 20-40% of the patients do not respond to CRT.
Methods And Results:
We examined consecutive patients in whom CRT was implanted. Response to CRT was defined as a decrease in the left ventricular end-systolic volume >or=10% after 6 months. A comparison was made between patients who were responders to CRT and those who were non-responders. A univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed with regard to predictors for response. Between January 2004 and January 2008, 174 patients who were treated with CRT were classified as responders [n = 95 (55%)] or non-responders [n = 79 (45%)]. Responders had a significantly larger horizontal interlead distance on the lateral thoracic X-ray [odds ratio (OR) 2.8 (1.2-6.6), P = 0.01], a septal-to-lateral delay >60 ms [OR 4.9 (2.0-11.4), P < 0.0001], non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy [OR 3.0 (1.3-6.9), P = 0.009], a left ventricular end-diastolic diameter <67 mm [OR 4.2 (1.8-9.9), P = 0.001], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use [OR 8.1 (1.7-38.2), P = 0.008], and no tricuspid valve insufficiency [OR 6.9 (1.3-35.5), P = 0.02]. Post-implantation responders had a significantly greater decrease in the intraventricular delay (septal-to-lateral delay 62 +/- 62 vs. 26 +/- 65 ms, P = 0.001), but not in the interventricular mechanical delay.
Conclusion:
Larger interlead distance on the lateral thoracic X-ray, associated with positioning of the left ventricular lead in the posterior position, is associated with response after 6 months of follow-up. Furthermore, diminishing the septal-to-lateral delay is predictive for response.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents

