Related Experiment Videos
Three exploratory studies of college theme parties
John D Clapp1, Julie M Ketchie, Mark B Reed
1Center for AOD Studies and Services, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92120, USA. jdclapp@mail.sdsu.edu
Drug and Alcohol Review
|August 13, 2008
Summary
College theme parties, often sexualized, are linked to increased alcohol consumption and related problems compared to non-themed events. Further research is needed on risks associated with these gatherings.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Public Health
- Substance Abuse Research
Background:
- College parties are a significant social setting for young adults.
- Theme parties are increasingly popular but their associated risks are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate characteristics and risks of college theme parties.
- To compare risks between theme and non-theme parties.
- To compare risks between risqué and non-risqué theme parties.
Main Methods:
- Mixed-methods approach combining qualitative focus groups and quantitative web surveys.
- Multi-level study involving observation, surveys, and breath alcohol samples at 226 college parties.
- Convenience and random sampling of college students and parties.
Main Results:
- Theme parties often feature sexualized themes and are more rowdy and louder than non-themed events.
- Theme parties are more likely to involve drinking games, kegs, and hard liquor.
- A greater number of alcohol-related problems were observed at themed parties.
Conclusions:
- Themed parties are associated with heavy drinking and attract individuals who heavy drink.
- These environments contribute to increased alcohol-related problems.
- Further investigation into the specific risks of themed and risqué themed parties is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Case Studies
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.