Ghosts of the past I: some muscles and fasciae in the head domain

Humans alone among primates lack a superficial head of the temporalis muscle, although a complete superficial muscle is present in 1% of humans and an incomplete one in 8%. Yet the temporal fascia of normal humans contains all the fascial sheets associated with that head even though it is absent. The implication is that humans have lost the superficial temporal muscle, that this is evident from the retention of the fascial sheets, and that the muscular variations represent situations where the muscle has persisted to some degree. Molecular factors in the head domain that are responsible for the development of the muscles of mastication (myosin heavy chain 16) are likewise different in humans than in all non-human species and seem to be responsible for the reduction of those muscles in humans. Could the loss of the superficial portion of the temporalis muscle be a component of this reduction? Could the uncommon muscular variations result from some slight persistence of the prior molecular situation? Could the persistence of the fascial sheets, even when the muscle is absent, be because the molecular factors responsible for connective tissues are not the same as those responsible for muscles? How much of all this can be visualised in the fossil record? Skeletal dimensions of the temporal fossa, partly related to the temporal muscle size, imply that it may be possible to determine in which fossils temporal muscle reduction has occurred. Likewise, surface features of the bone in modern humans without a superficial muscular component but with a strong complex fibrous element suggest that it might be possible to determine, in any fossil in which the surface preservation is good enough, how far back this situation may have persisted. It is already known that myosin heavy chain molecular dating suggests that the muscle reduction may have occurred about 2.4 million years ago.