Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

A Large Animal Model for Acute Kidney Injury by Temporary Bilateral Renal Artery Occlusion
Published on: February 2, 2021
The appropriateness of renal angioplasty. The ANPARIA software: a multidisciplinary expert panel approach
Laurent Gerbaud1, Géraud Manhes, Juliette Debourse
1CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Hôtel-Dieu, Service d'épidémiologie, économie de santé et prévention, 58 rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 01, France.
Insights
Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) may help preserve kidney function, but its appropriateness varies by patient. PTRA is often preferred over surgery for renal artery disease, though uncertainty remains in many cases.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) is an invasive procedure for renal artery stenosis.
- While PTRA can reduce antihypertensive drug use, its impact on delaying chronic dialysis and preserving renal function requires further investigation.
- Assessing the appropriateness of PTRA is crucial given its costs and potential complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the appropriateness of PTRA in influencing the progression of renal function.
- To compare PTRA with medical management and surgical revascularization for renal artery disease.
- To identify clinical predictors for favorable PTRA outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A standardized expert panel method and a modified Delphi process were employed.
- A comprehensive literature review informed expert opinion elicitation.
- 1848 distinct clinical scenarios were analyzed to determine the appropriateness of PTRA versus surgery.
Main Results:
- Revascularization appropriateness varied from 32% to 75% across scenarios, with an overall appropriateness of 48%.
- PTRA was favored over surgery in 94% of appropriate revascularization cases, except for specific instances of aortic atheroma.
- Favorable appropriateness predictors included kidney size >7 cm, absence of comorbidities, acute renal failure, stenosis >70%, and single artery involvement.
Conclusions:
- PTRA is appropriate in specific clinical situations, such as cardiac failure with pulmonary edema or acute renal artery thrombosis.
- The study developed the ANPARIA decision tree software for internet-based guidance on PTRA appropriateness.
- Significant uncertainty persists regarding PTRA's ability to prevent renal function decline in many clinical contexts.
Abstract:
Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) is an invasive technique that is costly and involves the risk of complications and renal failure. The ability of PTRA to reduce the administration of antihypertensive drugs has been demonstrated. A potentially greater benefit, which nevertheless remains to be proven, is the deferral of the need for chronic dialysis. The aim of the study (ANPARIA) was to assess the appropriateness of PTRA to impact on the evolution of renal function. A standardized expert panel method was used to assess the appropriateness of medical treatment alone or medical treatment with revascularization in various clinical situations. The choice of revascularization by either PTRA or surgery was examined for each clinical situation. Analysis was based on a detailed literature review and on systematically elicited expert opinion, which were obtained during a two-round modified Delphi process. The study provides detailed responses on the appropriateness of PTRA for 1848 distinct clinical scenarios. Depending on the major clinical presentation, appropriateness of revascularization varied from 32% to 75% for individual scenarios (overal 48%). Uncertainty as to revascularization was 41% overall. When revascularization was appropriate, PTRA was favored over surgery in 94% of the scenarios, except in certain cases of aortic atheroma where sugery was the preferred choice. Kidney size [7 cm, absence of coexisting disease, acute renal failure, a high degree of stenosis (C70%), and absence of multiple arteries were identified as predictive variables of favorable appropriateness ratings. Situations such as cardiac failure with pulmonary edema or acute thrombosis of the renal artery were defined as indications for PTRA. This study identified clinical situations in which PTRA or surgery are appropriate for renal artery disease. We built a decision tree which can be used via Internet: the ANPARIA software (http://www.chu-clermontferrand.fr/anparia/). In numerous clinical situations uncertainty remains as to whether PTRA prevents deterioration of renal function.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
