Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Conundrum of Compensation Based on Relative Value Units.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

'UNMIXING' Mixed-Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Rethinking Malignancy Risk Beyond Radiological Appearance.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Colloid Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Distinct and Less Aggressive Entity in the Spectrum of Pancreatic Malignancies.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Colloid Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Distinct and Less Aggressive Entity in the Spectrum of Pancreatic Malignancies.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Long-term Outcomes of Spleen-preserving Distal Pancreatectomy With or Without Preservation of Splenic Vessels: A Bi-institutional Experience.

Annals of surgery·2025
Same author

De novo formation of tuft and goblet cells protects the intrapancreatic biliary duct system from inflammatory injury.

The FEBS journal·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Reverse Needle Continuous Suture of the Pancreatic Duct to Jejunal Mucosal Pancreaticointestinal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
04:31

Reverse Needle Continuous Suture of the Pancreatic Duct to Jejunal Mucosal Pancreaticointestinal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: August 29, 2025

Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.

Cristina R Ferrone1, Andrew L Warshaw, David W Rattner

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. cferrone@partners.org

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery : Official Journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
|August 16, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Pancreatic fistula rates after distal pancreatectomy (DP) were 29%. Different stump closure methods, including staplers, did not significantly reduce fistula occurrence, highlighting an ongoing surgical challenge.

More Related Videos

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
10:58

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy

Published on: June 2, 2018

Application of Simplified Stent-bridging Pancreaticogastrostomy in Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
10:09

Application of Simplified Stent-bridging Pancreaticogastrostomy in Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: March 17, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Reverse Needle Continuous Suture of the Pancreatic Duct to Jejunal Mucosal Pancreaticointestinal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
04:31

Reverse Needle Continuous Suture of the Pancreatic Duct to Jejunal Mucosal Pancreaticointestinal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: August 29, 2025

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
10:58

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy

Published on: June 2, 2018

Application of Simplified Stent-bridging Pancreaticogastrostomy in Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
10:09

Application of Simplified Stent-bridging Pancreaticogastrostomy in Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: March 17, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Abdominal Surgery

Background:

  • Pancreatic fistula is a significant complication following distal pancreatectomy (DP).
  • High morbidity associated with pancreatic fistulas necessitates evaluating surgical techniques.
  • Understanding factors influencing fistula rates is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different pancreatic stump closure methods on fistula rates after DP.
  • To identify predictors of pancreatic fistula development in patients undergoing DP.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 462 consecutive patients undergoing DP.
  • Utilized the International Study Group classification for pancreatic fistula.
  • Analyzed clinicopathologic variables and stump closure techniques (suture, ligation, stapler, falciform patch).

Main Results:

  • Overall pancreatic fistula rate was 29%.
  • No significant difference in fistula rates was observed between various stump closure methods (p = 0.73).
  • Predictors of fistula included BMI > 30 kg/m², male gender, and additional organ resection.

Conclusions:

  • Stapled methods, with or without reinforcement, do not significantly reduce pancreatic fistula rates after DP.
  • Pancreatic fistula remains a significant and challenging complication after distal pancreatectomy.
  • Further research is needed to effectively reduce pancreatic fistula rates.