Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026
06:52
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
Published on: September 17, 2019
A structural equation modelling approach to the analysis of change
Yu-Kang Tu1, Vibeke Baelum, Mark S Gilthorpe
1Department of Periodontology, Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. y.k.tu@leeds.ac.uk
European Journal of Oral Sciences
|August 19, 2008
Summary
Comparing treatment efficacy often uses analysis of change. While two-sample t-tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) are common, ANCOVA is preferred for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, differing assumptions can lead to paradoxes in non-randomized studies.
Area of Science:
- Medical research
- Dental research
- Statistical analysis
Background:
- Analysis of change is a common study design for comparing treatment efficacy.
- Two-sample t-tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) are frequently used statistical methods.
- ANCOVA is often recommended for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) due to potentially higher statistical power.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explain the underlying assumptions of the two-sample t-test and ANCOVA in the analysis of change.
- To illustrate scenarios where these methods yield similar and different results.
- To highlight the importance of considering method assumptions for interpreting non-randomized studies, addressing 'Lord's paradox'.
Main Methods:
- Utilized structural equation modeling as a conceptual framework.
- Presented two illustrative examples comparing the two-sample t-test and ANCOVA.
- Analyzed the relationship between baseline values and change in treatment outcomes.
Main Results:
- Both two-sample t-tests and ANCOVA can yield similar results in the analysis of change for RCTs.
- Differences in assumptions regarding baseline values and change can lead to divergent results, particularly in non-randomized studies.
- These discrepancies can result in 'Lord's paradox', where different statistical approaches produce substantially different conclusions.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the distinct assumptions of the two-sample t-test and ANCOVA is crucial for accurate data interpretation.
- The choice of statistical method and its underlying assumptions significantly impact the analysis of change, especially in non-randomized research.
- Careful consideration of these assumptions is essential for the appropriate interpretation of findings from non-randomized studies.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
01:26Structuralism
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
01:11Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is a statistical tool that describes a mathematical relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
01:16System of Forces and Couples
In the analysis of structural systems, it is common to encounter members subjected to various forces and couple moments. Simplifying these systems can make the analysis more manageable and easier to understand. One approach to achieve this simplification is by moving a force to a point O that does not lie on its line of action and adding a couple with a moment equal to the moment of the force about point O.
The principle of transmissibility plays a crucial role in this process. According to...
The principle of transmissibility plays a crucial role in this process. According to...
01:29Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
02:06Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).