Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis
Published on: July 8, 2025
Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort
Luis H P Braga1, Armando J Lorenzo, Darius J Bägli
1Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. pippi.salle@sickkids.ca
Insights
Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after pyeloplasty is linked to dorsal lumbotomy and not using retrograde pyelography. These factors increase the risk of pyeloplasty failure in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Surgical Outcomes
- Urologic Oncology
Background:
- Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a common congenital anomaly in children.
- Open pyeloplasty is a standard surgical treatment for UPJO.
- Recurrent UPJO after pyeloplasty presents a significant management challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify risk factors associated with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) following open pyeloplasty in pediatric patients.
- To analyze the impact of surgical approach and perioperative imaging on pyeloplasty success rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 401 children undergoing open dismembered pyeloplasty (1997-2005).
- Analysis of potential risk factors including age, prenatal diagnosis, hydronephrosis grade, renal function, incision type (flank vs. dorsal lumbotomy), and retrograde pyelography.
- Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses to determine associations with pyeloplasty failure.
Main Results:
- A total of 21 patients (5.2%) experienced recurrent UPJO.
- Dorsal lumbotomy incision was associated with a higher rate of recurrent UPJO (8.1%) compared to flank incision (3.1%, p=0.02).
- Lack of preoperative retrograde pyelography was significantly linked to higher failure rates (8.3% vs. 2.1%, p=0.005).
- Multivariate analysis confirmed dorsal lumbotomy (OR 3.2) and absence of retrograde pyelography (OR 4.4) as independent risk factors for pyeloplasty failure.
Conclusions:
- Absence of retrograde pyelography and the use of dorsal lumbotomy are independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent UPJO after open pyeloplasty.
- While not directly proven as preventative, performing retrograde pyelography may indicate better surgical planning and improve pyeloplasty outcomes.
- These findings suggest that careful consideration of incision type and preoperative imaging is crucial for optimizing surgical success in pediatric UPJO repair.
Purpose:
Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty is a serious complication for which treatment remains challenging. We identified risk factors for persistent obstruction.
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 401 children who underwent open dismembered pyeloplasty between 1997 and 2005. Of these children 21 (5.2%) experienced recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Age, prenatal diagnosis, hydronephrosis grade, differential renal function, incision location (flank or dorsal lumbotomy), retrograde pyelography and stent placement were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for pyeloplasty failure.
Results:
Median age at surgery was 21 months and median followup was 36 months. Of the 401 patients dorsal lumbotomy was performed in 171 (42.6%) and a flank incision was used in 230 (57.4%). Retrograde pyelography was done in 195 patients (48.6%) and stents were used in 352 (87%). Age, prenatal diagnosis, degree of hydronephrosis, differential renal function and stent placement did not have an impact on pyeloplasty outcome on univariate analysis. Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction developed in 14 of 171 patients who had originally undergone dorsal lumbotomy vs 7 of 230 who had originally undergone a flank incision (8.1% vs 3.1%, p = 0.02) as well as in 17 of 206 who did not undergo initial retrograde pyelography vs 4 of 195 who did (8.3% vs 2.1%, p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis incision type and lack of retrograde pyelography showed significant association with pyeloplasty failure despite adjustment for other risk factors (p <0.05, OR 3.2 and 4.4, respectively).
Conclusions:
In this series lack of retrograde pyelography and dorsal lumbotomy were independently associated with a higher risk of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction. While retrograde pyelography or a flank approach could not be directly shown to prevent recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction, electing to perform retrograde pyelography may be a proxy for better perioperative planning, including the choice of incision, and it may ultimately increase the chances of successful pyeloplasty.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Disorders of the Urinary System
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common urinary system disorders. They are caused by bacteria that enter the urethra and can spread to the bladder resulting in cystitis. Pyelonephritis is the result of a UTI that has ascended to the level of the...
Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
