Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
Published on: August 17, 2015
[Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation
Shigemi Hosogaya1, Yukio Ozaki
1Clinical Laboratory, University of Yamanashi Hospital, Yamanashi.
Abstract:
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) developed a guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). The purpose of such guidance is to provide a basis for the international comparison of measurement results. In this study, we propose a basic protocol to evaluate and express uncertainty in measurement for routine test results in the clinical laboratory. We also sought to investigate the effects of measurement errors on the evaluation of biological variations in healthy subjects. To this end, we analyzed the allowable limits of analytical error which guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for the interpretation of clinical laboratory data. As a conclusion, we suggest that 1/2 or less of biological intraindividual variations is an appropriate criterion for an allowable limit of uncertainty to be applied in health check-ups, and this value is in agreement with previous reports. If this criterion as a marker for intra laboratory imprecision is met, it suggests that a given institute is able to evaluate time series changes in follow-up of individual data. If the reference interval of laboratory data for disease screening is shared by different institutes, it is suggested that a criterion of 1/4 or less of a biological inter- pulse intra-individual variation is appropriate. This criterion appears to be the goal for analytical inter-laboratory variations.
More Related Videos
07:43A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears
Published on: July 14, 2023
07:52Detection of Antibodies That Neutralize the Cellular Uptake of Enzyme Replacement Therapies with a Cell-based Assay
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...