Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making
Bethany J Weber1, Scott A Huettel
1Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Decision-making models suggest risky and intertemporal choices use similar processes. However, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reveals distinct brain activation patterns for each, indicating partially separate cognitive processes.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
Background:
- Decision-making models often assume shared psychological processes for choices involving risk (probabilistic outcomes) and delay (intertemporal outcomes).
- Behavioral evidence supporting this hypothesis has been inconclusive, necessitating alternative investigation methods.
- Functional neuroimaging combined with behavioral data offers a potential avenue to differentiate these decision-making domains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether risky choice and intertemporal choice engage distinct neural substrates.
- To identify specific brain regions associated with processing risk versus delay in monetary reward decisions.
- To explore the relationship between brain activation patterns and choice behavior in these domains.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to monitor brain activity in participants.
- Participants made choices between pairs of real monetary rewards with varying levels of risk or delay.
- Behavioral data on choices made were collected and correlated with neuroimaging findings.
Main Results:
- Both risky and intertemporal choices activated brain systems associated with executive control.
- Risky choices showed greater activation in posterior parietal and lateral prefrontal cortices.
- Intertemporal choices demonstrated increased activation in the posterior cingulate cortex and striatum.
- Activation in reward evaluation regions predicted riskier choices, while control region activation predicted delayed or less-risky choices.
Conclusions:
- The study identified distinct patterns of brain activation for risky and intertemporal choices.
- These findings suggest that decisions involving risk and delay utilize at least partially distinct cognitive processes.
- Neuroimaging provides valuable insights into the neural underpinnings differentiating these fundamental aspects of decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
The Availability Heuristic

