Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
Vascular access complications in long-term pediatric hemodialysis patients
Joshua J Zaritsky1, Isidro B Salusky, Barbara Gales
1Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. jzaritsky@mednet.ucla.edu
Insights
Pediatric hemodialysis (HD) patients using central venous catheters (CVCs) face higher complication rates and hospitalizations than those with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and fistulae (AVFs), despite similar quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Vascular Access
Background:
- Pediatric patients on hemodialysis (HD) often utilize central venous catheters (CVCs).
- Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are alternative vascular access methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare complications and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between CVCs and AVG/AVFs in pediatric HD patients.
- To evaluate the long-term implications of vascular access choice for pediatric maintenance HD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study at two large centers over one year.
- Included pediatric patients (<25 years, >20 kg) on HD for ≥3 months.
- Compared 30 CVC patients with 21 AVG/AVF patients.
Main Results:
- CVC patients experienced significantly higher infectious complication rates (3.7 hospital days/100 HD treatments vs. 0.2 for AVG/AVF).
- CVC patients required more access revisions (2.7 hospital days/100 HD treatments vs. 0.2 for AVG/AVF).
- No significant difference in HRQOL was observed between CVC and AVG/AVF groups.
Conclusions:
- Central venous catheters are associated with increased morbidity and complications in pediatric HD patients compared to AVGs/AVFs.
- AVGs/AVFs should be prioritized as primary vascular access for pediatric patients requiring long-term maintenance HD.
- Despite similar HRQOL, the higher complication rate necessitates a shift towards AVG/AVF use.
Abstract:
Current data demonstrate pediatric patients who remain on hemodialysis (HD) therapy are more likely to be dialyzed via central venous catheters (CVCs) than arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and fistulae (AVFs). We retrospectively compared complications and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) associated with different vascular access types at two large centers over a 1-year period. Patients included in the study were younger than 25 years of age, weighed >20 kg, and had received HD for at least 3 months. Thirty CVC patients and 21 AVG/AVF patients received a total of 2,393 and 3,506 HD treatments, respectively. The infectious complication rate was higher for CVC patients, who were hospitalized 3.7 days for each 100 HD treatments versus 0.2 days for AVG/AVF patients (p < 0.01). CVC patients also had a much higher rate of access revision, needing 2.7 hospital days every 100 HD treatments compared with 0.2 days for AVG/AVF patients (p < 0.01). HRQOL scores did not differ between groups. Thus, despite similar HRQOL, CVCs were associated with more complications and greater morbidity when compared with AVG/AVFs. These findings further emphasize the need to use AVG/AVFs as primary HD access for pediatric patients expected to receive a long course of maintenance HD.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Peritoneal Dialysis III: Nursing Management
