Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Allergic Reactions02:06

Allergic Reactions

Overview

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The definition of response and inadequate response to topical corticosteroid treatment in atopic dermatitis and related skin inflammatory diseases: A GA<sup>2</sup>LEN ADCARE statement paper.

The World Allergy Organization journal·2026
Same author

Proteomic analysis of horse hair extracts provides no evidence for the existence of a hypoallergenic Curly Horse breed.

Clinical and translational allergy·2026
Same author

Insights into Api m 10-Isoforms and Splice Variants: More Than One Major IgE-Binding Epitope.

Clinical and translational allergy·2026
Same author

Limitations and safety aspects related to the use of bacteriophages in food production.

FEMS microbiology reviews·2026
Same author

Hypersensitivity to Biologics Used in the Treatment of Inflammatory Disorders: Allergy Interventions and Outcomes.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2026
Same author

National and Regional Drug Survival of Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Danish Cohort Study.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE)
07:10

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE)

Published on: April 21, 2019

Soybean allergen detection methods--a comparison study.

Mona H Pedersen1, Thomas Holzhauser, Caroline Bisson

  • 1Laboratory of Medical Allergology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
|August 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Reliable soy detection methods are crucial for protecting individuals with soy allergies. Six different methods were compared, with histamine release (HR), enzyme-allergosorbent test (EAST) inhibition, and PCR detecting soy in all tested food products.

More Related Videos

A Component-resolved Diagnostic Approach for a Study on Grass Pollen Allergens in Chinese Southerners with Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma
06:34

A Component-resolved Diagnostic Approach for a Study on Grass Pollen Allergens in Chinese Southerners with Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma

Published on: June 4, 2017

Humanized Mediator Release Assay as a Read-Out for Allergen Potency
10:22

Humanized Mediator Release Assay as a Read-Out for Allergen Potency

Published on: June 29, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE)
07:10

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE)

Published on: April 21, 2019

A Component-resolved Diagnostic Approach for a Study on Grass Pollen Allergens in Chinese Southerners with Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma
06:34

A Component-resolved Diagnostic Approach for a Study on Grass Pollen Allergens in Chinese Southerners with Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma

Published on: June 4, 2017

Humanized Mediator Release Assay as a Read-Out for Allergen Potency
10:22

Humanized Mediator Release Assay as a Read-Out for Allergen Potency

Published on: June 29, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Food science
  • Allergen detection
  • Analytical chemistry

Background:

  • Soy is a common food ingredient, necessitating accurate detection methods for food safety and risk assessment, particularly for soy-allergic individuals.
  • Current analytical methods vary in their ability to detect soy, especially in processed foods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of six different analytical methods for detecting soy in various food products.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of these methods in identifying soy, especially in processed food matrices.

Main Methods:

  • Six methods were evaluated: polyclonal antibody sandwich ELISA, commercial competitive ELISA, in-house competitive ELISA, enzyme-allergosorbent test (EAST) inhibition, histamine release (HR), and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).
  • Eight food products with declared soy content were used as models to test the methods' detection limits and accuracy.

Main Results:

  • All methods showed good agreement in ranking soy content but differed in quantitative results.
  • The sandwich ELISA had the lowest detection limit (0.05 ppm) but detected soy in only 5 out of 8 products.
  • Histamine release (HR), EAST inhibition, and PCR successfully detected soy in all eight food products, indicating higher sensitivity for processed soy.

Conclusions:

  • No single method was sufficient for confirming soy presence in all food types.
  • Histamine release, EAST inhibition, and PCR demonstrated superior performance in detecting soy across diverse food matrices.
  • A combination of methods may be required for comprehensive soy detection in food products to ensure the safety of soy-allergic consumers.