Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Risk stratification and prognostic factors in the post-myocardial infarction patient
Christopher P Cannon1, Barry H Greenberg
1TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. cpcannon@partners.org
Insights
Risk assessment tools, including multimarker strategies, aid in managing myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Combining biomarkers helps identify high-risk individuals for better treatment and admission decisions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- 5 million US patients present with chest pain annually.
- 1 million diagnosed with myocardial infarction (MI).
- Physicians face challenges in risk stratification for adverse outcomes like left ventricular dysfunction (LVD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the benefits of risk assessment tools in managing post-MI patients with LVD.
- To highlight the role of multimarker strategies in patient management.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing clinical judgment, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings.
- Employing biomarkers classified by function (antecedent, screening, diagnostic, staging, prognostic).
- Implementing a multimarker strategy combining hemodynamic stress (BNP), inflammation (CRP), and necrosis (cardiac troponin) markers.
Main Results:
- Biomarkers aid in identifying patients needing early intervention or intensive therapy.
- Multimarker strategies assist in risk stratification.
- Optimizing admission and discharge decisions for post-MI patients.
Conclusions:
- Risk assessment tools, particularly multimarker strategies, are valuable in managing post-MI patients.
- These tools improve treatment guidance and decision-making for patients with LVD.
Abstract:
Among the 5 million patients presenting to emergency departments with chest pain each year in the United States, approximately 1 million are diagnosed with myocardial infarction (MI). Physicians have the difficult task of making decisions regarding admission and treatment and identifying patients at high risk for adverse outcomes, such as early mortality, left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), and heart failure. Several measures can be implemented in the process of risk assessment, including clinical judgment, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings, and the presence of biomarkers. Biomarkers--which can be classified as antecedent, screening, diagnostic, staging, or prognostic--may help identify the subset of patients who need early intervention and/or intensive therapy. Using a multimarker strategy that combines a marker of hemodynamic stress (brain natriuretic peptide) or of inflammation (C-reactive protein) with a marker of necrosis (cardiac troponin) may help to risk-stratify patients, guide treatment, and optimize admission and discharge decisions. This article discusses the potential benefits of risk assessment tools in the management of post-MI patients with LVD.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...