Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction
James D Flaherty1, Charles J Davidson, David P Faxon
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. j-flaherty2@md.northwestern.edu
Insights
Early revascularization after myocardial infarction (MI) improves survival and left ventricular function. Procedures like percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass surgery are compared to thrombolytic therapy for post-MI patients at risk of heart failure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Myocardial infarction (MI) survivors face high risks of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), heart failure, and mortality.
- Left ventricular function impairment post-MI significantly increases adverse outcomes and mortality risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of early coronary revascularization on survival and left ventricular function in post-MI patients.
- To compare percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with thrombolytic therapy for managing post-MI LVD.
- To review rescue revascularization strategies and emerging interventional techniques for post-MI LVD.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of primary and nonemergent percutaneous coronary revascularization versus thrombolytic therapy.
- Review of outcomes including survival, left ventricular function, and complications (recurrent MI, stroke).
- Description of rescue revascularization and advanced techniques like ventricular assist devices and bioabsorbable stents.
Main Results:
- Early revascularization plays a crucial role in preserving and restoring left ventricular function after MI.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention and CABG surgery demonstrate specific effects on survival and complications compared to thrombolysis.
- Rescue revascularization is indicated for specific patient subsets failing initial therapy or presenting late.
Conclusions:
- Coronary revascularization is vital for improving outcomes in patients with post-MI left ventricular dysfunction.
- Advanced interventional techniques show promise but require further clinical validation.
- Timely and appropriate revascularization strategies are key to reducing mortality and morbidity in MI survivors.
Abstract:
Patients who have had a myocardial infarction (MI) are at high risk for developing left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), which predisposes them to heart failure and is associated with an increased mortality risk. Early coronary revascularization, either with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, plays an important role in the preservation and restoration of left ventricular function after MI. This article discusses the effects of primary and nonemergent percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures on survival, left ventricular function, and the occurrence of complications, such as recurrent MI and stroke, compared with the effects of thrombolytic therapy. In addition, this article describes rescue revascularization procedures for patients who failed thrombolysis and those presenting relatively late or with negative electrocardiographic findings. Advanced interventional techniques, such as percutaneous ventricular assist devices and bioabsorbable stents, are very promising and may potentially help improve the outcomes of post-MI patients with LVD; however, the use of these techniques requires further validation.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

