Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
Risks of allergy vial contamination: comparison of mixing in-office versus under ventilation hood
P Chase Lay1, Richard Bass, Larry F Hughes
1Department of Surgery/Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, USA.
Objective:
Compare the risk of bacterial contamination of allergy immunotherapy vials prepared in-office versus those mixed under a ventilation hood.
Study Design:
Prospective single-blinded study.
Setting:
Tertiary otolaryngology outpatient clinic.
Results:
Five hundred thirty-seven vials were prepared and cultured for aerobes and anaerobes over an 11-month period. Three hundred twenty vials were arbitrarily assigned to in-office preparation and 217 to under-hood preparation. A total of two positive cultures occurred in vials prepared in-office and one from under-hood preparation. Follow-up cultures of these three vials were all negative. No patients receiving injections had signs or symptoms of skin or systemic infections from the injections.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that the risk of bacterial contamination in immunotherapy vials in both groups is rare.
Insights
Bacterial contamination risk in allergy immunotherapy vials is low, whether prepared in-office or under a ventilation hood. This study found rare contamination in both preparation methods, with no resulting patient infections.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Microbiology
- Pharmaceutical Compounding
Background:
- Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) involves administering gradually increasing doses of allergens to patients.
- Sterile preparation of AIT vials is crucial to prevent infection.
- Standard practice for compounding sterile preparations often involves ventilation hoods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of bacterial contamination in allergy immunotherapy vials prepared using two distinct methods: in-office preparation versus preparation under a ventilation hood.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of different AIT vial preparation techniques.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-blinded study was conducted over 11 months.
- 537 allergy immunotherapy vials were prepared: 320 in-office and 217 under a ventilation hood.
- Vials were cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
Main Results:
- A low rate of bacterial contamination was observed in both preparation groups.
- Two positive cultures occurred in vials prepared in-office, and one in vials prepared under a ventilation hood.
- Follow-up cultures of contaminated vials were negative, and no patient infections were reported.
Conclusions:
- The risk of bacterial contamination in allergy immunotherapy vials is rare, regardless of whether they are prepared in-office or under a ventilation hood.
- Both preparation methods appear to yield safe immunotherapy vials.
- Further research may explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of each method.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Allergic Reactions
Allergic Drug Reactions
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)

