Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components.

Evelyne Mercure1, Frederic Dick, Mark H Johnson

  • 1Birkbeck School of Psychology, University of London, London, UK. e.mercure@psychology.bbk.ac.uk

Brain Research
|August 30, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decreased attention in 10- and 14-month-olds with neurofibromatosis type 1 and association with later ADHD traits.

Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders·2026
Same author

The neonatal brain at rest: A systematic review of task-free functional connectivity in the first 100 days.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Theta Power at 10 Months of Age Predicts Developmental Change in Language in Infants With and Without an Elevated Likelihood for Autism.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Randomised Controlled Trial of Gaze-Based Attention Training Intervention for Infants With a Family History of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Follow-up Outcomes at 2 and 3 Years.

Journal of attention disorders·2026
Same author

Experience-Sensitive Effects on Temporal Profiles of Social Attention in Early Childhood.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2026
Same author

From early communication to bimodal vocabulary acquisition: A longitudinal study of hearing children with deaf mothers from infancy to school-age years.

Bilingualism (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Electroacupuncture treatment enhances hippocampal growth hormone level and restores mitochondrial function in vascular dementia rats.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Effects of transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation on thalamic relay: A randomized brain imaging study in chronic low back pain patients.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Adaptive reconfiguration of prefrontal networks during prolonged cognitive interference: Evidence from fNIRS.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Horizontal image compression significantly impairs human face identity recognition.

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

Researchers investigated event-related potential (ERP) signatures for featural and configural face processing. The P2 component was sensitive to configural changes, while attention tasks modulated the P300, indicating distinct neural pathways for face perception.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Face Recognition

Background:

  • Human face recognition relies on both individual features and their spatial arrangement (second-order configuration).
  • Understanding the neural basis of distinguishing between featural and configural processing is crucial for comprehending face perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify event-related potential (ERP) components sensitive to subtle changes in facial features and second-order configuration.
  • To determine if directing attention towards features or configuration influences neural processing during face perception.

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged same/different face pairs with variations in features, configuration, or both.
  • A second experiment involved participants focusing on either features or configuration while ignoring other differences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) recorded ERPs, including P1, N170, P2, and P300 components.

    • Main Results:

    • The P1 and N170 ERP components were unaffected by feature or second-order configural differences.
    • The P2 component showed increased amplitude for configural modifications compared to featural modifications.
    • Modulation of the P300 component confirmed successful attentional focus manipulation in the second experiment.

    Conclusions:

    • The P2 component appears sensitive to configural face processing, potentially reflecting greater visual cortical feedback.
    • Attention significantly influences neural responses related to featural and configural face information, as evidenced by P300 modulation.
    • These findings contribute to understanding the distinct neural mechanisms underlying different aspects of face recognition.