Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Improved Hysteroscopic Resection of Endometrial Polyps Using 6-Fr Micro-Scissors and Forceps
Published on: August 2, 2024
Laparoscopy in women with unexplained infertility: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Sharon E Moayeri1, Henry C Lee, Ruth B Lathi
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. smoayeri@yahoo.com
Laparoscopy is a cost-effective initial treatment for unexplained infertility in young women. It becomes particularly advantageous when infertility treatment dropout rates exceed 9% per cycle, improving live-birth outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Health Economics
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Unexplained infertility affects a significant number of couples seeking fertility treatment.
- The optimal management strategy balancing cost and effectiveness remains a key clinical question.
- Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive surgical option with potential diagnostic and therapeutic benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy as an initial management strategy for unexplained infertility.
- To compare laparoscopy with expectant management versus laparoscopy with infertility therapy against standard treatment algorithms and no treatment.
- To determine the economic viability of laparoscopic interventions in improving live-birth rates.
Main Methods:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a computer-generated decision analysis tree.
- Data were sourced from existing literature and clinical practice at an academic in vitro fertilization center.
- Four treatment strategies were modeled: no treatment, standard infertility treatment algorithm (SITA), laparoscopy with expectant management (LSC/EM), and laparoscopy with infertility therapy (LSC/IT).
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated, with sensitivity analyses performed.
Main Results:
- Laparoscopy with expectant management (LSC/EM) was the preferred strategy, with an ICER of $128,400 per live-birth under base-case assumptions.
- Sensitivity analyses indicated that LSC/EM remained cost-effective unless patient dropout from infertility treatments fell below 9% per cycle.
- Key factors influencing outcomes included patient dropout rates, surgical costs, and the impact of untreated endometriosis.
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopy represents a cost-effective approach for the initial management of unexplained infertility in young women.
- The economic benefit of laparoscopy is particularly pronounced when infertility treatment dropout rates are high (exceeding 9% per cycle).
- These findings support the integration of laparoscopy into the early stages of infertility management to improve patient outcomes and resource utilization.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
11:53Laparoscopic Oocyte Retrieval and Cryopreservation during Vaginoplasty for Treatment of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome
Published on: May 10, 2022