Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial Dosimetric-Based Prediction of Long-Term Urinary Toxicity After Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Education as a Tool to Navigate Changing Technology in Radiation Oncology.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Dosimetric Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Versus Reduced Margin Computed Tomography Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2025
Same author

Proton GRID and LATTICE treatment planning techniques for clinical liver SFRT treatments.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

A Retrospective Analysis of the First Clinical 5DCT Workflow.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Will large language model AI (ChatGPT) be a benefit or a risk to quality for submission of medical physics manuscripts?

Medical physics·2025
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Measured and Monte Carlo simulated electron backscatter to the monitor chamber for the varian TrueBeam linac (2016<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>61</b>8779).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: 3D range-modulator for scanned particle therapy: development, Monte Carlo simulations and experimental evaluation (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>7075).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Recent progress in applications of computing to radiotherapy (ICCR 2016).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Novel TMS coils designed using an inverse boundary element method.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Linac mechanic QA using a cylindrical phantom.

Maria Mamalui-Hunter1, Harold Li, Daniel A Low

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|August 30, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an automated method using portal images and fiducial markers for linear accelerator (linac) mechanical quality assurance (QA). The new technique allows for more frequent and thorough mechanical QA in radiation therapy.

More Related Videos

Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning
08:41

Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning

Published on: July 14, 2020

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &alpha; and &beta; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning
08:41

Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning

Published on: July 14, 2020

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &alpha; and &beta; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Imaging Technology

Background:

  • Accurate radiation therapy relies on precise linear accelerator (linac) mechanical operation.
  • Current linac mechanical quality assurance (QA) methods are time-consuming, limiting their frequency and thoroughness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an automated method for evaluating linac mechanical performance using portal imaging.
  • To enable more efficient, thorough, and frequent mechanical QA for improved radiation therapy accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • A novel approach using projection portal images of a phantom with radiopaque fiducial markers.
  • Marker autodetection incorporated imager response modeling and non-uniform background compensation.
  • Linac mechanical parameters estimated via nonlinear multi-objective optimization of marker locations.

Main Results:

  • Precise estimation of linac geometry parameters including gantry angle deviation, sag, source-to-axis distance (SAD), source-to-detector distance (SDD), and couch motion.
  • Accurate determination of imager shift and orientation parameters.
  • High accuracy in marker detection and optimization, with maximum coordinate differences under 0.25 mm.

Conclusions:

  • The developed automated procedure offers a more efficient and comprehensive approach to linac mechanical QA.
  • This method has the potential to significantly enhance the quality and safety of radiation therapy delivery.
  • Implementation of this automated QA will facilitate more frequent mechanical assessments, ensuring optimal linac performance.