Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR01:30

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:22

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

Generic intravenous (IV) drugs are considered bioequivalent to their branded counterparts due to their 100% bioavailability upon administration. However, variations in stability among different drug products can significantly influence their therapeutic performance, even if they are pharmaceutically equivalent.Cefuroxime, a prophylactic antimicrobial, is often used as a single-dose IV injection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. A 3 g dose typically provides...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I01:21

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I

An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care.
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution itself.
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I01:30

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

Accountability in nursing is a fundamental principle that underscores the obligation of nurses to take responsibility for their actions and answer for any errors or omissions in patient care. This principle is grounded in the professional, legal, and ethical frameworks that shape nursing practice. For instance, nurses must adhere to all relevant laws, regulations, and practice standards, including guidelines set forth by nursing boards and professional bodies, to ensure their actions comply...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global norms, local institutions: a controlled comparative case study of WHO essential medicines policy adoption in Eastern Europe.

Globalization and health·2026
Same author

Mind the governance gap: a one health scoping review of national AMR performance indicators.

npj antimicrobials and resistance·2026
Same author

Patient-physician sex concordance in cardiovascular care: context matters.

European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes·2026
Same author

Best practices along the kidney transplantation clinical journey.

Frontiers in transplantation·2026
Same author

Omission and hallucination prevalence of clinical guidelines in diagnostic large language model outputs.

BMJ health & care informatics·2026
Same author

Integrating financial risk into cardiometabolic prevention: From price transparency to patient-level insights into diabetes-related spending.

American journal of preventive cardiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

Physician revalidation in Europe.

Sherry Merkur1, Elias Mossialos, Morgan Long

  • 1London School of Economics and Political Science.

Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|August 30, 2008
PubMed
Summary

European countries lack a unified approach to health professional competence. Revalidation and continuing professional development requirements differ significantly, impacting mobility and quality of care across member states.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare regulation
  • Professional standards
  • European health policy

Background:

  • Growing patient mobility in Europe contrasts with a lack of harmonized standards for health professional competence.
  • The current European legal framework inadequately addresses periodic revalidation and continuing professional development (CPD).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the variations in definitions and mechanisms of health professional revalidation across European member states.
  • To highlight the implications of these diverse regulatory approaches on professional mobility within the EU.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of revalidation policies and legal frameworks in selected European countries.
  • Examination of different approaches to continuing medical education (CME), peer review, appraisal, and relicensure.

More Related Videos

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
09:00

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Published on: April 13, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
09:00

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Published on: April 13, 2021

Main Results:

  • Significant divergence exists in how European countries define and implement revalidation and CPD.
  • Some nations utilize continuing medical education for recertification, while others incorporate peer review and appraisal systems.
  • Monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for professional standards also vary considerably.

Conclusions:

  • The heterogeneity in health professional regulation poses challenges for seamless professional mobility across Europe.
  • The European Commission needs to address these regulatory disparities to ensure consistent quality of care and facilitate workforce mobility.